...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Internal Medicine >Effects of short-term treatment with metformin on markers of endothelial function and inflammatory activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
【24h】

Effects of short-term treatment with metformin on markers of endothelial function and inflammatory activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

机译:二甲双胍短期治疗对2型糖尿病患者内皮功能和炎症活性标志物的影响:一项随机,安慰剂对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract. de Jager J, Kooy A, Lehert Ph, Bets D, Wulffele MG, Teerlink T, Scheffer PG, Schalkwijk CG, Donker AJM, Stehouwer CDA (Bethesda General Hospital Hoogeveen, Hoogeveen, The Netherlands; University of Mons, Belgium; E. Merck Nederland B.V. Amsterdam; VU University Medical Centre, and Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Amsterdam; and University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht; The Netherlands). Effects of short-term treatment with metformin on markers of endothelial function and inflammatory activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Intern Med 2005; 257: 100-109.Objectives. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed that treatment with metformin decreases macrovascular morbidity and mortality independent of glycaemic control. We hypothesized that metformin may achieve this by improving endothelial function and chronic, low-grade inflammation. Data on this issue are scarce and we therefore tested, in the setting of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, whether metformin can affect endothelial function and low-grade inflammation. Design. The Hyperinsulinaemia the Outcome of its Metabolic Effects (HOME) trial is a double-blind trial, in which all patients were randomized to receive either metformin or placebo in addition to insulin therapy. At the beginning and the end of a 16-week treatment period fasting blood samples were drawn and a physical examination was carried out. Setting. The trial was conducted in the outpatient clinics of three nonacademic hospitals (Hoogeveen, Meppel and Coevorden; the Netherlands). Subjects. Patients were included if they were between 30 and 80 years of age; had received a diagnosis of diabetes after the age of 25; had never had an episode of ketoacidosis; and their blood glucose-lowering treatment previously consisted of oral agents but now only consisted of either insulin (n = 345) or insulin and metformin (n = 45). We excluded pregnant women and women trying to become pregnant, patients with a Cockroft-Gault-estimatedcreatinine clearance <50 mL min(-1), or low plasma cholinesterase (reference value <3.5 units L(-1)), patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III/IV), or patients with other serious medical or psychiatric disease. A total of 745 eligible patients were approached; 390 gave informed consent and were randomized (196 metformin, 194 placebo). About 353 patients completed 16 weeks of treatment (171 metformin, 182 placebo). Main outcome measures. The HOME trial was designed to study the metabolic and cardiovascular effects of metformin during a follow-up of 4 years. Presented here are the results of an interim analysis after 16 weeks of treatment. Results. When compared with placebo, metformin treatment was associated with an increase in urinary albumin excretion of 21% (-1 to +48; P = 0.06); a decrease in plasma von Willebrand factor of 6% (-10 to -2; P = 0.0007); a decrease in soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 of 4% (-7 to -2; P = 0.0002); a decrease in soluble E-selectin of 6% (-10 to -2; P = 0.008); a decrease in tissue-type plasminogen activator of 16% (-20 to -12; P < 0.0001); and a decrease in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 of 20% (-27 to -10; P = 0.0001). These changes could not be explained by metformin-associated changes in glycaemic control, body weight or insulin dose. Markers of inflammation, i.e. C-reactive protein and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, did not change with metformin treatment. Conclusions. In patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin, metformin treatment was associated with improvement of endothelial function, which was largely unrelated to changes in glycaemic control, but not with improvement of chronic, low-grade inflammation.
机译:抽象。 de Jager J,Kooy A,Lehert Ph,Bets D,Wulffele MG,Teerlink T,Scheffer PG,Schalkwijk CG,Donker AJM,Sthouwer CDA(Bethesda General Hospital Hoogeveen,Hoogeveen,Netherlands;比利时蒙斯大学; E.Merck Nederland BV阿姆斯特丹; VU大学医学中心和阿姆斯特丹心血管研究所;以及荷兰马斯特里赫特马斯特里赫特大学医院。二甲双胍短期治疗对2型糖尿病患者内皮功能和炎症活性标志物的影响:一项随机,安慰剂对照试验。 J Intern Med 2005; 257:100-109。目标。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)显示,二甲双胍治疗可降低大血管发病率和死亡率,而与血糖控制无关。我们假设二甲双胍可以通过改善内皮功能和慢性低度炎症来实现这一目标。关于该问题的数据很稀少,因此我们在一项随机,安慰剂对照试验的背景下测试了二甲双胍是否会影响内皮功能和低度炎症。设计。高胰岛素血症代谢影响的结果(HOME)试验是一项双盲试验,其中所有患者均随机接受除胰岛素治疗外的二甲双胍或安慰剂治疗。在16周治疗期的开始和结束时,抽取空腹血样并进行身体检查。设置。该试验是在三所非学术医院(霍赫芬,梅珀尔和科沃登;荷兰)的门诊部进行的。主题。如果患者年龄在30至80岁之间,则将其包括在内; 25岁以后被诊断出患有糖尿病;从未发生过酮症酸中毒;并且他们的降血糖治疗以前由口服药物组成,但现在仅由胰岛素(n = 345)或胰岛素和二甲双胍(n = 45)组成。我们排除了孕妇和试图怀孕的妇女,Cockroft-Gault估计的肌酐清除率<50 mL min(-1)或血浆胆碱酯酶低(参考值<3.5单位L(-1)),充血性心脏病的患者衰竭(纽约心脏协会III / IV级)或患有其他严重医学或精神病的患者。共有745名合格患者入组; 390名知情同意并被随机分组​​(196二甲双胍,194安慰剂)。约353位患者完成了16周的治疗(171位二甲双胍,182位安慰剂)。主要观察指标。 HOME试验旨在研究二甲双胍在4年的随访期间的代谢和心血管作用。此处介绍的是治疗16周后的中期分析结果。结果。与安慰剂相比,二甲双胍治疗可使尿白蛋白排泄增加21%(-1至+48; P = 0.06)。血浆von Willebrand因子降低6%(-10至-2; P = 0.0007);可溶性血管细胞粘附分子-1降低4%(-7至-2; P = 0.0002);可溶性E-选择素降低6%(-10至-2; P = 0.008);组织型纤溶酶原激活剂减少了16%(-20至-12; P <0.0001);纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1降低20%(-27至-10; P = 0.0001)。这些变化不能用二甲双胍相关的血糖控制,体重或胰岛素剂量变化来解释。二甲双胍治疗不会改变炎症标志物,即C反应蛋白和可溶性细胞间粘附分子-1。结论。在接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,二甲双胍治疗与内皮功能的改善有关,这在很大程度上与血糖控制的变化无关,但与慢性低度炎症的改善无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号