首页> 外文期刊>Clinical nutrition >Assessement of resting energy expenditure of obese patients: comparison of indirect calorimetry with formulae.
【24h】

Assessement of resting energy expenditure of obese patients: comparison of indirect calorimetry with formulae.

机译:肥胖患者静息能量消耗的评估:间接量热法与配方的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Determining the caloric expenditure of overweight (Body mass index - BMI from 25-29.9 kg/m(2)) or obese (BMI> or =30 kg/m(2)) patients is a difficult task. The importance of the measurement using indirect calorimetry (IC) is to avoid the administration of an inadequate caloric load, which can increase clinical morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare the resting energy expenditure (REE) obtained by IC with that estimated by the Harris-Benedict (HB) and the Ireton-Jones (IJ) equations and a fixed amount of 21 kcal/kg of body weight, using actual, average and adjusted weights. METHODS: A total of 71 IC measurements were prospectively performed in 44 patients using the "DELTATRAC II" calorimeter. In 53 of the measurements the patients were on mechanical ventilation and 18 were performed using the canopy, in the fasting state and 24h after achieving calculated caloric requirements. RESULTS: The best REE prediction value in the fasting state was obtained with the HB equation using the actual body weight (HB/ABW), 1873+/-484 kcal/day (p=0.49) when compared to the REE of 1798+/-495 kcal/day measured by IC. After achieving caloric needs, the best REE prediction values were using the HB/ABW equation, 1873+/-484 kcal/day (p=0.56) and the IJ equation with the adjusted body weight, 2103+/-580 kcal/day (p=0.19) when compared to 1948+/-507 kcal/day measured by IC. Although, when the above results were plotted on the Bland and Altman limits of agreement test their average bias were low, but the ranges of their absolute values from the observed average agreement were large, > or =531 kcal. CONCLUSION: From these data we can conclude that even though the average values obtained with the equations utilized to predict the REE for this population, showed good correlation with those by IC, as they had the best comparative absolute results, however they demonstrated an unacceptable variability when matched to the measured REE values.
机译:背景与目的:确定超重(身体质量指数-BMI从25-29.9 kg / m(2))或肥胖(BMI>或= 30 kg / m(2))患者的热量消耗是一项艰巨的任务。使用间接量热法(IC)进行测量的重要性在于避免热量负荷不足,否则会增加临床发病率。这项研究的目的是比较由IC获得的静止能量消耗(REE)与由Harris-Benedict(HB)和Ireton-Jones(IJ)方程估算的静能量消耗以及21 kcal / kg体重的固定量,使用实际,平均和调整后的权重。方法:前瞻性地使用“ DELTATRAC II”热量表对44例患者进行了71次IC测量。在53项测量中,患者采用机械通气,18例在达到计算的热量需求后的禁食状态和24小时内使用顶篷进行。结果:与1798 + / REE相比,使用实际体重(HB / ABW)1873 +/- 484 kcal / day(p = 0.49)的HB方程,可以得出最佳的空腹状态REE预测值。通过IC测量-495 kcal /天。在满足热量需求之后,最佳的REE预测值是使用HB / ABW方程1873 +/- 484 kcal / day(p = 0.56)和具有调整后体重的IJ方程2103 +/- 580 kcal / day(与IC测得的1948 +/- 507 kcal /天相比,p = 0.19)。尽管将上述结果绘制在一致性测试的Bland和Altman极限上时,它们的平均偏差较低,但是从所观察到的平均一致性中得出的绝对值范围较大,大于或等于531 kcal。结论:根据这些数据,我们可以得出结论,即使通过用于预测该人群的REE的方程式获得的平均值与IC的相关性也显示出良好的相关性,因为它们具有最佳的绝对绝对值,但是它们表现出不可接受的变异性与测得的REE值匹配时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号