首页> 外文期刊>Journal of laparoendoscopic and advanced surgical techniques, Part A >Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after unsuccessful endoscopic stone removal
【24h】

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after unsuccessful endoscopic stone removal

机译:内镜取石失败后腹腔镜胆总管探查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: When common bile duct (CBD) stone removal by endoscopy fails, stone removal is a mandatory procedure for the surgeon. However, it is unclear that the laparoscopic procedure is the alternative treatment in this setting. The purpose of this study is to investigate the result of laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) following unsuccessful CBD stone removal by endoscopy. Subjects and Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of 82 consecutive LCBDEs. Group 1 included patients who underwent secondary LCBDE after stone removal by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failed. Group 2 was defined when primary LCBDE was performed without ERCP. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: There were 44 patients in Group 1 and 38 patients in Group 2. There were no significant differences in demographics. Stone clearance was nearly complete in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups for operative time, hospital days, open conversion rate, recurrence rate, or complications. Conclusions: LCBDE is an acceptable alternative treatment when endoscopic CBD stone removal is impossible or incomplete. ? Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
机译:背景:当通过内窥镜清除胆总管(CBD)结石失败时,去除结石是外科医生的强制性程序。但是,尚不清楚在这种情况下腹腔镜手术是替代治疗。这项研究的目的是调查内窥镜检查未成功清除CBD结石后的腹腔镜CBD勘探(LCBDE)的结果。受试者与方法:本研究是对82个连续LCBDE的回顾性分析。第一组包括经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)清除结石后接受继发LCBDE失败的患者。第2组是在没有ERCP的情况下进行主要LCBDE时定义的。比较两组的围手术期结果。结果:第1组有44例患者,第2组有38例患者。人口统计学无显着差异。两组的结石清除率均接近完成。两组的手术时间,住院天数,开放转换率,复发率或并发症无显着差异。结论:当不可能或不完全清除内镜下CBD结石时,LCBDE是可接受的替代治疗。 ?玛丽·安·利伯特公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号