首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intensive care medicine >Fever after rewarming: Incidence of pyrexia in postcardiac arrest patients who have undergone mild therapeutic hypothermia
【24h】

Fever after rewarming: Incidence of pyrexia in postcardiac arrest patients who have undergone mild therapeutic hypothermia

机译:复温后发烧:经历轻度治疗性体温过低的明信片骤停患者发烧的发生率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Induction of mild therapeutic hypothermia (TH; temperature 32-34-C) has become standard of care in manyhospitals for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Pyrexia, or fever, is known to be detrimental in patients with neurologicinjuries such as stroke or trauma. The incidence of pyrexia in the postrewarming phase of TH is unknown. We attempted todetermine the incidence of fever after TH and hypothesized that those patients who were febrile after rewarming would haveworse clinical outcomes than those who maintained normothermia in the postrewarming period.Methods: Retrospective dataanalysis of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) over a period of 29 months (December 2007 to April 2010). Inclusioncriteria: OHCA, age >18, return of spontaneous circulation, and treatment with TH. Exclusion criteria: traumatic arrest andpregnancy. Data collected included age, sex, neurologic outcome, mortality, and whether the patient developed fever (temperature> 100.4-F, 38-C) within 24 hours after being fully rewarmed to a normal core body temperature after TH. We used simpledescriptive statistics and Fisher exact test to report our findings.Results: A total of 149 patients were identified; of these, 82(55%) underwent TH. The mean age of the TH cohort was 66 years, and 28 (31%) were female. In all, 54 patients survived for>24 hours after rewarming and were included in the analysis. Among the analyzed cohort, 28 (52%) of 54 developed fever within24 hours after being rewarmed. Outcome measures included in-hospital mortality as well as neurologic outcome as defined by adichotomized Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score. When comparing neurologic outcomes between the groups, 16(57%) of 28 in the postrewarming fever group had a poor outcome (CPC score 3-5), while 15 (58%) of 26 in the no-fever grouphad a favorable outcome (P =.62). In the fever group, 15 (52%) of 28 died, while in the no-fever group, 14 (54%) of 26 died(P =.62).Conclusion: Among a cohort of patients who underwent mild TH after OHCA, more than half of these patients developedpyrexia in the first 24 hours after rewarming. Although there were no significant differences in outcomes between febrileand nonfebrile patients identified in this study, these findings should be further evaluated in a larger cohort. Future investigationsmay be needed to determine whether postrewarming temperature management will improve the outcomes in this population.
机译:背景:引起轻度治疗性体温过低(TH;温度32-34-C)已成为许多医院中心脏骤停昏迷幸存者的护理标准。已知发热,发烧对患有中风或外伤等神经系统损伤的患者有害。 TH的再武装后阶段发热的发生率未知。我们试图确定TH后发烧的发生率,并假设复温后发热的患者的临床结局要比再补充后维持正常体温的患者更差。方法:回顾性数据分析的院外心脏骤停幸存者(OHCA)为期29个月(2007年12月至2010年4月)。纳入标准:OHCA,年龄> 18,自发循环恢复,并接受TH治疗。排除标准:外伤性逮捕和妊娠。收集的数据包括年龄,性别,神经系统结局,死亡率,以及患者在TH完全恢复至正常核心体温后24小时内是否发烧(温度> 100.4-F,38-C)。我们使用简单描述性统计和Fisher精确检验报告了我们的发现。其中82(55%)接受了TH。 TH队列的平均年龄为66岁,女性为28岁(31%)。总共有54例患者在复温后存活> 24小时,并被纳入分析。在被分析的队列中,有54名中的28名(52%)在再次变暖后24小时内发烧。结果测量包括院内死亡率以及神经功能预后,这是由二等分脑功能分类(CPC)评分定义的。比较两组之间的神经系统结局,预热后发热组中28人中有16人(57%)的预后较差(CPC评分3-5),而无发热组中26人中有15人(58%)的预后良好( P = .62)。在发烧组中,有28人中有15人(52%)死亡,在无发热组中有26人中14人(54%)死亡(P = .62)。结论:在OHCA后接受轻度TH的患者中,这些患者中有一半以上在复温后的最初24小时内出现了发热。尽管在这项研究中确定的发热和非发热患者之间的结局无显着差异,但应在更大的队列中进一步评估这些发现。可能需要进行进一步的调查以确定重新武装后的温度管理是否会改善该人群的结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号