首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrometeorology >Evaluation of Radar Precipitation Estimates from the National Mosaic and Multisensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimation System and the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing System over the Conterminous United States
【24h】

Evaluation of Radar Precipitation Estimates from the National Mosaic and Multisensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimation System and the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing System over the Conterminous United States

机译:通过美国本土的马赛克和多传感器定量降水估算系统和WSR-88D降水处理系统对雷达降水估算进行评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study evaluated 24-, 6-, and 1-h radar precipitation estimated from the National Mosaic and Multisensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimation System (NMQ) and the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) Precipitation Processing System (PPS) over the conterminous United States (CONUS) for the warm season April–September 2009 and the cool season October 2009–March 2010. Precipitation gauge observations from the Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) were used as the ground truth. Gridded StageIV multisensor precipitation estimates were applied for supplementary verification. The comparison of the two systems consisted of a series of analyses including the linear correlation coefficient (CC) and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the radar precipitation estimates and the gauge observations, large precipitation amount detection categorical scores, and the reliability of precipitation amount distribution. Data stratified for the 12 CONUS River Forecast Centers (RFCs) and for the cold rains events with bright-band effects were analyzed additionally. Major results are 1) the linear CC of NMQversus ASOS are generally higher than that of PPS versus ASOS over CONUS, while the spatial variations stratified by the RFCs may switch with seasons; 2) compared to the precipitation distribution of ASOS, NMQ shows less deviation than PPS; 3) for the cold rains verified against ASOS, NMQ has higher CC and PPS has lower RMSE for 6-h and higher RMSE for 1-h cold rains; and 4) for the precipitation detection categorical scores, either NMQ or PPS can be superior, depending on the time interval and season. The verification against StageIV gridded precipitation estimates showed that NMQ consistently had higher correlations and lower biases than did PPS.
机译:这项研究评估了美国国家马赛克和多传感器定量降水估算系统(NMQ)和天气监视雷达1988多普勒(WSR-88D)降水处理系统(PPS)估算的24、6和1小时雷达降水量。在2009年4月至9月的温暖季节和2009年10月至2010年3月的凉爽季节是美国的同期(CONUS)。地面自动观测系统(ASOS)的降水量计观测值被用作地面实况。网格化StageIV多传感器降水量估计值用于补充验证。两种系统的比较包括一系列分析,包括雷达降水量估计值与观测值观测值之间的线性相关系数(CC)和均方根误差(RMSE),大的降水量检测类别得分以及降水量分布的可靠性。此外,还分析了12个CONUS河流预报中心(RFC)和具有亮带效应的冷雨事件的分层数据。主要结果是:1)NMQversus ASOS的线性CC通常高于PPS与CONUS的ASOS的线性CC,而RFC分层的空间变化可能随季节而变化; 2)与ASOS的降水分布相比,NMQ的偏差小于PPS; 3)对于经ASOS验证的冷雨,NMQ的CC较高,PPS的6h的RMSE较低,而1h的冷雨的RMSE较高;和4)对于降水检测类别得分,取决于时间间隔和季节,NMQ或PPS可能更好。对StageIV网格降水估算的验证表明,与PPS相比,NMQ始终具有更高的相关性和更低的偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号