...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Methods to improve neural network performance in daily flows prediction
【24h】

Methods to improve neural network performance in daily flows prediction

机译:在日流量预测中提高神经网络性能的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, three data-preprocessing techniques, moving average (MA), singular spectrum analysis (SSA), and wavelet multi-resolution analysis (WMRA), were coupled with artificial neural network (ANN) to improve the estimate of daily flows. Six models, including the original ANN model without data preprocessing, were set up and evaluated. Five new models were ANN-MA, ANN-SSA1, ANN-SSA2, ANN-WMRA1, and ANN-WMRA2. The ANN-MA was derived from the raw ANN model combined with the MA. The ANN-SSA1, ANN-SSA2, ANN-WMRA1 and ANN-WMRA2 were generated by using the original ANN model coupled with SSA and WMRA in terms of two different means. Two daily flow series from different watersheds in China (Lushui and Daning) were used in six models for three prediction horizons (i.e., 1-, 2-, and 3-day-ahead forecast). The poor performance on ANN forecast models was mainly due to the existence of the lagged prediction. The ANN-MA, among six models, performed best and eradicated the lag effect. The performances from the ANN-SSA1 and ANN-SSA2 were similar, and the performances from the ANN-WMRA1 and ANN-WMRA2 were also similar. However, the models based on the SSA presented better performance than the models based on the WMRA at all forecast horizons, which meant that the SSA is more effective than the WMRA in improving the ANN performance in the current study. Based on an overall consideration including the model performance and the complexity of modeling, the ANN-MA model was optimal, then the ANN model coupled with SSA, and finally the ANN model coupled with WMRA.
机译:在本文中,将三种数据预处理技术(移动平均值(MA),奇异频谱分析(SSA)和小波多分辨率分析(WMRA))与人工神经网络(ANN)结合使用,以改善每日流量的估算。建立并评估了六个模型,包括没有数据预处理的原始ANN模型。五个新模型是ANN-MA,ANN-SSA1,ANN-SSA2,ANN-WMRA1和ANN-WMRA2。 ANN-MA是从原始ANN模型与MA结合得出的。 ANN-SSA1,ANN-SSA2,ANN-WMRA1和ANN-WMRA2是通过使用原始ANN模型与SSA和WMRA结合使用的两种不同方法生成的。在六个模型中使用了来自中国不同流域(鹿水和大宁)的两个日流量序列,用于三个预测范围(即提前1天,2天和3天的预测)。 ANN预测模型的较差性能主要是由于存在滞后预测。 ANN-MA在六个模型中表现最佳,并消除了滞后效应。 ANN-SSA1和ANN-SSA2的性能相似,ANN-WMRA1和ANN-WMRA2的性能相似。但是,在所有预测范围内,基于SSA的模型表现出比基于WMRA的模型更好的性能,这意味着在当前研究中,SSA比WMRA在改善ANN性能方面更为有效。在综合考虑模型性能和建模复杂性的基础上,ANN-MA模型是最优的,然后是将ANN模型与SSA耦合,最后是将ANN模型与WMRA耦合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号