首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Forecasting stream water temperature using regression analysis, artificial neural network, and chaotic non-linear dynamic models
【24h】

Forecasting stream water temperature using regression analysis, artificial neural network, and chaotic non-linear dynamic models

机译:使用回归分析,人工神经网络和混沌非线性动力学模型预测溪流水温

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Stream water temperature is considered both a dominant factor in determining the longitudinal distribution pattern of aquatic biota and as a general metabolic indicator for the water body, since so many biological processes are temperature dependent. Moreover, the plunging depth of stream water, its associated pollutant load, and its potential impact on lake/reservoir ecology is dependent on water temperature. Lack of detailed datasets and knowledge on physical processes of the stream system limits the use of a phenomenological model to estimate stream temperature. Rather, empirical models have been used as viable alternatives. In this study, an empirical model (artificial neural networks (ANN)), a statistical model (multiple regression analysis (MRA)), and the chaotic non-linear dynamic algorithms (CNDA) were examined to predict the stream water temperature from the available solar radiation and air temperature. Observed time series data were non-linear and non-Gaussian, thus the method of time delay was applied to form the new dataset that closely represent the inherent system dynamics. Phase-space reconstruction plots show that time lag equal to 0 and greater than 10 result in highly dependent (a well-defined attractor) and highly independent (no attractor at all) reconstructions, respectively, and, therefore, may not be appropriate to use. Delayed vector was found to be strongly correlated with the original vector when time lag is small (i.e. less than 3-day) and vice versa. Power spectrum analysis and autocorrelation function suggested that the time series data was chaotic and mutual information function indicates that optimum time lag was approximately 3-day. The chaotic non-linear dynamic algorithm and four-layer back propagation neural network (4BPNN) optimized by micro-genetic algorithms (mu GA) showed that the prediction performance was optimum when data are presented to the model with 1-day and 3-day time lag, respectively. The prediction performance efficiency of MRA is higher for time lag greater than 3-day, however, the incremental performance efficiency rate significantly decreased after 3-day time lag. The prediction performance efficiency of mu GA-4BPNN was found to be the highest among all algorithms considered in this study. Air temperature was found to be the most important variable in stream temperature forecasting; however, the prediction performance efficiency was somewhat higher if short wave radiation was included.
机译:溪水温度既被认为是决定水生生物群纵向分布格局的主要因素,又被视为水体的一般代谢指标,因为如此多的生物过程都与温度有关。此外,溪流水的深度下降,其相关的污染物负荷以及对湖泊/水库生态系统的潜在影响取决于水温。缺乏详细的数据集和对河流系统物理过程的了解,限制了使用现象学模型来估算河流温度。相反,经验模型已被用作可行的替代方案。在这项研究中,检验了经验模型(人工神经网络(ANN)),统计模型(多元回归分析(MRA))和混沌非线性动态算法(CNDA),以根据可得的水量预测溪流水温。太阳辐射和气温。观测到的时间序列数据是非线性且非高斯的,因此采用了时间延迟方法来形成新的数据集,该数据集可以很好地表示系统的固有动力学特性。相空间重构图表明,等于0且大于10的时间滞后分别导致高度依赖(明确定义的吸引子)和高度独立(完全没有吸引子)的重构,因此可能不适合使用。当时滞较小(即小于3天)时,发现延迟向量与原始向量高度相关,反之亦然。功率谱分析和自相关函数表明时间序列数据比较混乱,互信息函数表明最佳时滞约为3天。通过微遗传算法(mu GA)优化的混沌非线性动力学算法和四层反向传播神经网络(4BPNN)表明,当将数据分别提供给模型的1天和3天时,预测性能最佳时间滞后。对于大于3天的时间延迟,MRA的预测性能效率较高,但是,经过3天的时间延迟,MRA的预测性能效率显着下降。在本研究中考虑的所有算法中,mu GA-4BPNN的预测性能效率最高。人们发现,气温是河流温度预测中最重要的变量。但是,如果包含短波辐射,则预测性能效率会更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号