首页> 外文期刊>Journal of human hypertension >Effects of long-acting ACE inhibitor (temocapril) and long-acting Ca channel blocker (amlodipine) on 24-h ambulatory BP in elderly hypertensive patients.
【24h】

Effects of long-acting ACE inhibitor (temocapril) and long-acting Ca channel blocker (amlodipine) on 24-h ambulatory BP in elderly hypertensive patients.

机译:长效ACE抑制剂(temocapril)和长效Ca通道阻滞剂(氨氯地平)对老年高血压患者24小时动态血压的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a prospective randomised cross-over study, we compared the effects of ACE inhibitor temocapril and calcium channel blocker (CCB) amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure in 59 asymptomatic elderly hypertensive patients (mean age 69 years). This study was performed in a cross-over fashion after a 2-week placebo period and 4 to 8 weeks each of treatment with temocapril and amlodipine. Of those 59 hypertensive patients, three patients with side effects and 10 patients whose office BPs did not achieve the target BPs were excluded, and the remaining 46 were analysed in this study: they consisted of 30 dippers, with a night time reduction in systolic BP (SBP) > or = 10% and 16 non-dippers, with reduction by < 10%. At the baseline, there were no significant differences in the office, 24-h or daytime BPs between the two groups (dippers and non-dippers). Though the office BPs and daytime BPs were successfully controlled to the same levels with both treatments and in both dipping groups, the antihypertensive effects were stronger with the CCB than with the ACE inhibitor in the night time and morning, especially in non-dippers. We conclude that even though office BPs were controlled successfully to almost the same levels, there is a possibility that these long-acting drugs have differential antihypertensive effects on night time and morning BPs among hypertensive patients with different night time BP dipping statuses.
机译:在一项前瞻性随机交叉研究中,我们比较了ACE抑制剂替莫卡普利和钙通道阻滞剂(氨氯地平)对59例无症状老年高血压患者(平均年龄69岁)的动态血压的影响。这项研究是在安慰剂2周和替莫卡普利和氨氯地平各治疗4至8周后以交叉方式进行的。在这59例高血压患者中,排除了3例有副作用的患者和10例办公室BP未能达到目标BP的患者,其余46例在本研究中进行了分析:他们包括30只浸渍药,夜间收缩压降低(SBP)>或= 10%和16个非北斗星,减少了<10%。基线时,两组(北斗星和非北斗星)的办公室,24小时或白天血压无显着差异。尽管两种治疗方法和两个浸泡组的办公室血压和白天血压均成功地控制在相同水平,但在夜间和早晨,CCB的降压作用要强于ACE抑制剂,尤其是在非北斗七星的情况下。我们得出的结论是,即使成功地将办公室血压控制在几乎相同的水平,这些长效药物仍有可能在具有不同夜间BP浸泡状态的高血压患者中对夜间和早晨BP产生不同的降压作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号