...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of human hypertension >Relaxation therapies for the management of primary hypertension in adults: a Cochrane review.
【24h】

Relaxation therapies for the management of primary hypertension in adults: a Cochrane review.

机译:放松疗法治疗成人原发性高血压:Cochrane评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of relaxation to lower high blood pressure. We searched electronic bibliographic databases and grey literature to identify randomized controlled trials comparing relaxation therapies with no active treatment or sham therapy, enrolling adult participants with raised systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or = 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 85 mm Hg and follow-up > or = 8 weeks. Twenty-five trials with up to 5 years follow-up, assessing 1198 participants, met our inclusion criteria and were meta-analysed. Overall, relaxation resulted in small, statistically significant reductions in SBP (mean difference: -5.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: -8.2 to -2.8) and DBP (mean difference: -3.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.3 to -1.6) compared to the control. Substantial heterogeneity between trials (I2 > 70%) was not explained by duration of follow-up, type of control, type of relaxation therapy or baseline blood pressure. The 9 trials that reported blinding of outcome assessors found a non-significant net reduction in blood pressure (SBP mean difference: -3.2 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.7 to 1.4) associated with relaxation, as did the 15 trials comparing relaxation with sham therapy (SBP mean difference: -3.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.1 to 0.2). Adequate randomization was confirmed in only seven trials and concealment of allocation in only one. In view of the poor quality of the included trials and unexplained variation between trials, the evidence in favour of a causal association between relaxation and blood pressure reduction is weak. Some of the apparent benefit of relaxation was probably due to aspects of treatment unrelated to relaxation.
机译:这篇综述的目的是评估放松对降低高血压的有效性。我们搜索了电子书目数据库和灰色文献,以比较比较没有积极治疗或假治疗的放松疗法,纳入收缩压(SBP)≥140 mm Hg或舒张压(DBP)≥140的成年参与者的随机对照试验= 85毫米汞柱,随访>或= 8周。长达5年的随访的25项试验,评估了1198名参与者,符合我们的纳入标准,并进行了荟萃分析。总体而言,放松导致SBP(均差:-5.5 mm Hg,95%CI:-8.2至-2.8)和DBP(均差:-3.5 mm Hg,95%CI:-5.3至- 1.6)与对照相比。试验之间的实质异质性(I2> 70%)不能通过随访时间,对照类型,放松疗法或基线血压来解释。 9项报告结果评估者不知所措的试验发现,与放松相关的血压净降低(SBP平均差:-3.2 mm Hg,95%CI:-7.7至1.4)无显着降低,而15项比较放松与假手术(SBP平均差:-3.5 mm Hg,95%CI:-7.1至0.2)。只有7项试验证实了足够的随机分组,只有1项掩盖了分配。鉴于纳入试验的质量较差以及试验之间的原因无法解释,因此支持放松与降压之间因果关系的证据很薄弱。放松的一些明显好处可能是由于与放松无关的治疗方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号