首页> 外文期刊>Clinical nursing research >Regional Evidence-Based Practice Fellowship Program: Impact on Evidence-Based Practice Implementation and Barriers
【24h】

Regional Evidence-Based Practice Fellowship Program: Impact on Evidence-Based Practice Implementation and Barriers

机译:区域循证实践研究金计划:对循证实践实施和障碍的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This quasi-experimental, pre- and posttest study evaluated the impact of a 9-month collaborative regional evidence-based practice (EBP) fellowship program on practice, attitude, knowledge, and perceived barriers associated with implementation of EBP. Three annual cohorts (N = 142) of nurses attending a fellowship program from 2008 to 2010 participated in this study. Paired t tests showed statistically significant increases in practice (+.82; p <.001) and knowledge/skills (+.78; p <.001) associated with EBP, but showed no change in attitude (+.16; p =.198). All four Barriers subscales showed statistically significant decreases (-.10 to -.31; p =.036 to <.001). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that the barriers explained 6.8%, 8.9% and 13.9% of variances in practice, attitude and knowledge/skills, respectively. The collaborative regional fellowship program improved the practice and knowledge/skills associated with EBP. The barriers were significant predictors of the EBP implementation among the targeted group of nurses participating in the fellowship program.
机译:这项准实验,测试前和测试后研究评估了为期9个月的协作性区域循证实践(EBP)奖学金计划对与实施EBP相关的实践,态度,知识和感知障碍的影响。从2008年到2010年,参加奖学金计划的三名年度护士(N = 142)参加了这项研究。配对的t检验显示与EBP相关的实践(+.82; p <.001)和知识/技能(+.78; p <.001)在统计学上有显着增加,但态度无变化(+.16; p = .198)。所有四个障碍子量表均显示出统计学上的显着下降(-.10至-.31; p = .036至<.001)。分层多元回归分析表明,这些障碍分别解释了实践,态度和知识/技能方面的差异的6.8%,8.9%和13.9%。区域合作研究金计划改善了与EBP相关的实践和知识/技能。障碍是参与奖学金计划的目标护士群体中EBP实施的重要预测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号