首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Immunological Methods >Comparison of hybridoma screening methods for the efficient detection of high-affinity hapten-specific monoclonal antibodies.
【24h】

Comparison of hybridoma screening methods for the efficient detection of high-affinity hapten-specific monoclonal antibodies.

机译:有效检测高亲和力半抗原特异性单克隆抗体的杂交瘤筛选方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compares diverse microplate-based hybridoma screening methods for the generation of hapten-(aflatoxin-) specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Standard indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screenings (with immobilization of hapten-protein conjugate and use of enzyme-labeled anti-mouse IgG as tracer) were compared with direct ELISAs (with antibody immobilization and use of a hapten-enzyme conjugate as tracer). Although direct ELISA is rarely used for routine hybridoma screenings, it showed considerable advantages compared to the indirect assays. Standard indirect ELISA screening can lead to a considerable number of false positives (up to about 50% false positives of all 373 supernatants tested) if the antibody concentrations in the supernatants are too high. Direct ELISAs gave useful screening results for the different supernatant dilutions chosen. At most 3 false positives were detected out of 373 supernatants. However, the sensitivity of the direct ELISA screening is generallylower compared to indirect ELISA, and individual high-affinity MAbs might be classified as false negative. Therefore, a modified indirect ELISA screening was also developed. It includes pre-incubation of the supernatants in anti-mouse IgG-coated microplates which are then transferred into the (indirect) hapten conjugate-coated microplates. This screening method leads to excellent results with good overall selectivity and sensitivity. It can also be conveniently combined with the direct ELISA screening. Using these improved screening methods, aflatoxin-specific MAbs could be generated with IC50 values down to 3 ng/l (aflatoxin concentration).
机译:这项研究比较了基于微孔板的杂交瘤筛选方法,以生成半抗原((黄曲霉毒素))特异性单克隆抗体(MAb)。将标准间接酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)筛查(固定半抗原-蛋白结合物并使用酶标记的抗小鼠IgG作为示踪剂)与直接ELISA(固定抗体和使用半抗原-酶结合物作为示踪剂)进行了比较示踪剂)。尽管直接ELISA很少用于常规杂交瘤筛查,但与间接检测相比,它显示出相当大的优势。如果上清液中的抗体浓度过高,则标准的间接ELISA筛选可能会导致相当数量的假阳性(在所有373个上清液中高达约50%的假阳性)。直接ELISA对选择的不同上清液稀释液给出了有用的筛选结果。在373个上清液中最多检测到3个假阳性。但是,与间接ELISA相比,直接ELISA筛选的灵敏度通常较低,并且个别高亲和力单克隆抗体可能被归类为假阴性。因此,还开发了改进的间接ELISA筛选。它包括在抗小鼠IgG包被的微孔板中预孵育上清液,然后将其转移到(间接)半抗原偶联物包被的微孔板中。这种筛选方法可产生出色的结果,并具有良好的整体选择性和灵敏度。它也可以方便地与直接ELISA筛选结合使用。使用这些改进的筛选方法,可以产生IC50值低至3 ng / l(黄曲霉毒素浓度)的黄曲霉毒素特异性MAb。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号