首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences >Comparison of polar ozone and aerosol measurement (POAM) II and stratospheric aerosol and gas experiment (SAGE) II aerosol measurements from 1994 to 1996
【24h】

Comparison of polar ozone and aerosol measurement (POAM) II and stratospheric aerosol and gas experiment (SAGE) II aerosol measurements from 1994 to 1996

机译:1994年至1996年极地臭氧和气溶胶测量(POAM)II与平流层气溶胶和气体实验(SAGE)II气溶胶测量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We describe statistical comparisons between version 6.0 Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) II and version 5.931 Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II measurements of aerosol extinction and derived surface area and volume density between 1994 and 1996. Qualitatively, both instruments show similar decay of the aerosol extinction at visible and near-IR wavelengths in the altitude range from 12 to 30 km, resulting from dissipation of the Mount Pinatubo aerosols. We present quantitative differences between the SAGE II and FOAM II extinctions at 1 and 0.45 mu m for temporally and spatially coincident measurements. On average, for the moderately elevated aerosol extinction levels encountered in 1994, differences in the extinction at higher and lower altitudes. Differences at 0.45 mu m are within +/-35% between 13 and 30 km, increasing at lower altitudes. For the lower aerosol extinction conditions of 1995 and 1996, the comparisons indicate that systematic errors contributed to larger relative differences between the instruments. These effects are manifested as "asymmetries" in the Northern Hemisphere versus Southern Hemisphere comparisons, and in the 1 mu m versus 0.45 mu m comparisons. We suggest that these systematic differences are partly due to altitude registration errors in one or both of the instruments. Average volume densities derived using a principal component analysis technique agreed within about 10% at high northern latitudes between 16 and 27 km, and within about 30% at high southern latitudes. In most cases, surface area density differences were somewhat larger. Although a dedicated validation campaign was not feasible for FOAM II, overall the results presented here confirm the validity of the FOAM II aerosol measurements for scientific studies. [References: 32]
机译:我们描述了1994年至1996年间6.0版的极地臭氧和气溶胶测量(POAM)II版和5.931版的平流层气溶胶和气体实验(SAGE)II测量之间的统计比较。定性地,这两种仪器显示出相似的结果在皮纳图博火山气溶胶消散的影响下,在海拔12至30 km的可见光和近红外波长处,气溶胶消光的衰减。我们提出了SAGE II和FOAM II灭绝在1和0.45微米之间的定量差异,用于时间和空间上的重合测量。平均而言,对于1994年遇到的中等程度的气溶胶绝灭水平,高海拔和低海拔的灭绝差异都很大。在13至30公里之间,0.45微米处的差异在+/- 35%之内,在较低的海拔高度上会增加。对于1995年和1996年较低的气溶胶消光条件,比较表明系统误差导致了仪器之间的较大相对差异。这些影响在北半球与南半球的比较中以及在1μm与0.45μm的比较中表现为“不对称”。我们建议这些系统性差异部分是由于其中一种或两种仪器的高度配准错误。使用主成分分析技术得出的平均体积密度在16至27 km之间的北高纬度地区约为10%,而在南纬高纬度地区约为30%。在大多数情况下,表面积密度差异较大。尽管针对FOAM II进行专门的验证活动是不可行的,但此处提供的总体结果证实了FOAM II气溶胶测量在科学研究中的有效性。 [参考:32]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号