...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Aortic, but not brachial blood pressure category enhances the ability to identify target organ changes in normotensives
【24h】

Aortic, but not brachial blood pressure category enhances the ability to identify target organ changes in normotensives

机译:主动脉血压类别而非主动脉血压类别可增强识别血压正常人群中目标器官变化的能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS:: We sought to determine whether within normal/high-normal blood pressure (BP) ranges (120-139/80-89 mmHg), aortic BP may further refine BP-related cardiovascular risk assessment, as determined from target organ changes. Methods: In 1169 participants from a community sample of African ancestry, 319 (27%) of whom had a normal/high-normal BP, aortic BP was determined using radial applanation tonometry and SphygmoCor software, and target organ changes assessed from carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) (n = 1025), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (n = 944), and left ventricular mass indexed to height (LVMI) (n = 690). Results: Normal versus high-normal BP categories failed to differentiate between those participants with a BP above optimal values with versus without multivariate-adjusted target organ changes. However, in those with a normal/high-normal BP with aortic SBP values that were less than 95% confidence interval of healthy participants with optimal BP values (45% of those with a normal/high-normal BP), no unadjusted or multivariate adjusted target organ changes were noted. In contrast, those with a normal/high-normal BP with aortic SBP values that exceeded optimal thresholds, demonstrated unadjusted and multivariate adjusted increases in PWV and LVMI and decreases in eGFR (P < 0.05 to P < 0.005 after multivariate adjustments). Conclusion: In contrast to normal versus high-normal BP categories which do not clearly distinguish normotensives with from those without organ damage, noninvasively determined aortic BP measurements may refine the ability to detect those with a normal/high-normal BP at risk of BP-related cardiovascular damage.
机译:目的::我们试图确定是否在正常/高正常血压(BP)范围内(120-139 / 80-89 mmHg),主动脉BP可以进一步完善与BP相关的心血管风险评估,具体取决于目标器官的变化。方法:在来自非洲血统的社区样本中的1169名参与者中,有319名(27%)血压正常/高正常,使用radial骨压平眼压计和SphygmoCor软件确定了主动脉BP,并通过颈动脉股骨评估了靶器官变化脉搏波速度(PWV)(n = 1025),估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)(n = 944)和左心室质量指数(LVMI)(n = 690)。结果:正常血压和高血压血压类别无法区分那些血压高于最佳值的参与者,而没有经过多变量调整的目标器官变化。但是,在那些具有正常/高正常血压且主动脉SBP值小于具有最佳BP值的健康参与者的置信区间的患者中(主动脉血压的正常值/高正常BP者的45%),没有未经调整或多元的注意调整后的目标器官变化。相比之下,那些具有正常/高正常血压且主动脉SBP值超过最佳阈值的患者,PWV和LVMI的未调整和多变量调整增加,而eGFR降低(多变量调整后P <0.05至P <0.005)。结论:与正常血压和高血压正常血压类别不能清楚地区分血压正常与那些没有器官损害的血压相比,非侵入性确定的主动脉血压测量值可以提高检测血压正常或高血压正常血压的能力。相关的心血管损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号