...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Prognostic impact of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure components in high-risk type 2 diabetic patients: The Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study
【24h】

Prognostic impact of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure components in high-risk type 2 diabetic patients: The Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study

机译:临床和动态血压成分对高危2型糖尿病患者的预后影响:里约热内卢2型糖尿病队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND:: The prognostic importance of tight clinic blood pressure (BP) control is controversial in diabetic patients. The objective was to investigate the prognostic impact of clinic and ambulatory BPs for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes. METHODS:: In a prospective cohort study, 565 type 2 diabetic patients had clinical, laboratory and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) data obtained at baseline and during follow-up. The primary endpoints were a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox survival and splines regression analyses assessed associations between each BP component [SBP, DBP and pulse pressure (PP)] and the endpoints. RESULTS:: After a median follow-up of 5.75 years, 88 total cardiovascular events and 70 all-cause deaths occurred. After adjustments for cardiovascular risk factors, clinic SBP and DBPs were predictive of the composite endpoint but not of all-cause mortality, whereas all ambulatory BP components were predictors of both endpoints. Ambulatory systolic and PPs were the strongest predictors and achieved ambulatory BPs during follow-up improved risk prediction in relation to baseline values. When categorized at clinically relevant cut-off values, risk began only at clinic BPs at least 140/90a??mmHg, whereas for ambulatory BPs it began at lower values (≥120/75a??mmHg for the 24-h period). CONCLUSION:: ABPM provides more valuable information regarding cardiovascular risk stratification than office BPs and should be performed, if possible, in every high-risk type 2 diabetic patient. Achieved 24-h ambulatory BPs less than 120/75a??mmHg are associated with significant cardiovascular protection and, if confirmed by other studies, may be considered as BP treatment targets.
机译:背景:严格控制临床血压(BP)的预后重要性在糖尿病患者中存在争议。目的是研究临床和门诊血压对2型糖尿病的心血管发病率和死亡率的预后影响。方法:在一项前瞻性队列研究中,有565名2型糖尿病患者在基线和随访期间获得了临床,实验室和门诊BP监测(ABPM)数据。主要终点是致命和非致命心血管事件与全因死亡率的综合。多变量Cox生存率和样条回归分析评估了每个BP组件[SBP,DBP和脉压(PP)]与端点之间的关联。结果:中位随访时间为5.75年,发生了88例心血管事件和70例全因死亡。调整心血管危险因素后,临床SBP和DBP可以预测复合终点,但不能预测全因死亡率,而所有动态BP分量都是两个终点的预测指标。动态的收缩压和PPs是最强的预测指标,并且在随访过程中相对于基线值的改善的风险预测中,动态BP达到了。按临床相关的临界值分类时,风险仅在临床血压至少为140 /90aΔmmHg时才开始,而非卧床血压则以较低的值开始(24小时内≥120/75aΔmmHg)开始。结论:ABPM提供了比办公室BP更有价值的心血管风险分层信息,如果可能,应在每位高危2型糖尿病患者中进行。达到的24小时动态血压低于120 / 75a?mmHg与显着的心血管保护有关,并且,如果其他研究证实,则可以将其视为BP治疗目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号