...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Comparison of nurse- and physician-determined clinic blood pressure levels in patients referred to a hypertension clinic: implications for subsequent management.
【24h】

Comparison of nurse- and physician-determined clinic blood pressure levels in patients referred to a hypertension clinic: implications for subsequent management.

机译:由高血压诊所诊治的护士和医生确定的诊所血压水平的比较:对后续管理的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: When measuring BP, the physician induces a transient pressor response triggered by an alarm reaction. This 'white-coat effect' can influence therapeutic decisions. Whether it depends on the characteristics of the physician has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the 'white-coat effect' induced by several physicians in a large sample of patients, using the blood pressure measured by trained nurses as a reference. SETTING: Referral hypertension clinic. METHODS: Patients were selected for the study if they had been referred for the first time to the clinic and if they had had their supine systolic/diastolic blood pressure measured by a trained nurse (mean of the last two of three measurements taken every 1 min by an oscillometric device) and a physician (auscultatory method using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer). Physicians were included in the study provided they had seen at least 25 patients during the study period. The between-physician difference was assessed using linear regression analysis. Physician blood pressure was the dependent and nurse blood pressure was the independent variable. RESULTS: From 1 January 1997 to 15 September 1997, 1062 patients (50% male, aged 52 +/- 14 years), seen by 10 physicians (26-187 patients per physician) and one nurse were included for analysis. The mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure for physicians was 162 +/- 27/ 97 +/- 15 mmHg and that for the nurse was 155 +/- 24/ 88 +/- 14 mmHg. The nurse-physician differences were -6 mmHg (range -67 to +66) for systolic and -8 mmHg (-44 to +31) for diastolic blood pressures. Major differences were observed between individual physicians. Intercepts of the physician blood pressure versus nurse blood pressure relationship ranged from 0.1 -60.7 mmHg for systolic and from 13.3-55.3 mmHg for diastolic pressures. The slopes of this relationship differed less between physicians for systolic (0.72-1) than for diastolic pressures (0.56-0.97). There was no difference between the patients seen by physicians in patients' age, sex, tobacco consumption, anti-hypertensive treatment or target-organ damage. CONCLUSION: Large between-physician differences exist in the magnitude of the white-coat effect that cannot be explained by patient characteristics. Physicians should therefore not make any decisions based on blood pressure measured manually during a first encounter.
机译:背景:在测量血压时,医生会引起警报反应触发短暂的升压反应。这种“白衣效应”会影响治疗决策。是否取决于医生的特征尚未得到评估。目的:以受过培训的护士测量的血压为参考,评估几位医生在大量患者体内引起的“白大褂效应”。地点:转诊高血压诊所。方法:如果患者是首次转诊到诊所,并且他们的仰卧收缩压/舒张压由训练有素的护士测量(每1分钟进行的三项测量中最后两项的平均值),则被选择进行研究由示波法测量设备)和医师(使用标准水银血压计的听诊方法)。医师包括在研究中,前提是他们在研究期间至少看过25名患者。使用线性回归分析评估医师之间的差异。医师血压是因变量,护士血压是因变量。结果:从1997年1月1日至1997年9月15日,纳入1062名患者(50%男性,年龄52 +/- 14岁),由10位医师(每位医师26-187位患者)和一名护士进行了观察分析。医生的平均收缩压/舒张压为162 +/- 27/97 +/- 15 mmHg,护士的平均收缩压/舒张压为155 +/- 24/88 +/- 14 mmHg。护士医师的收缩压差异为-6 mmHg(-67至+66),舒张压的差异为-8 mmHg(-44至+31)。各个医师之间存在主要差异。医生的血压与护士的血压之间的关系在收缩压范围为0.1 -60.7 mmHg,在舒张压范围为13.3-55.3 mmHg。收缩压(0.72-1)与舒张压(0.56-0.97)之间,这种关系的斜率差异较小。在医生看过的患者之间,患者的年龄,性别,烟草消费,抗高血压治疗或靶器官损害无差异。结论:白大褂效应的大小存在很大的医师之间差异,无法用患者的特征来解释。因此,医师不应根据初次接触时手动测量的血压做出任何决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号