...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on intima-media thickness in previously untreated, elderly hypertensive patients (the ELVERA trial).
【24h】

Effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on intima-media thickness in previously untreated, elderly hypertensive patients (the ELVERA trial).

机译:氨氯地平和赖诺普利对以前未治疗的老年高血压患者内膜中层厚度的影响(ELVERA试验)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of the calcium channel blocker amlodipine and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril on intima-media thickness (IMT) in elderly, previously untreated hypertensive individuals. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized parallel-group trial (the ELVERA trial). PATIENTS: The study population comprised 166 newly diagnosed hypertensive individuals (aged 60-75 years) with diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 115 mmHg or systolic blood pressure between 160 and 220 mmHg, or both. INTERVENTION: Patients were allocated randomly to groups to receive amlodipine 5-10 mg or lisinopril 10-20 mg for 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Before and after 1 and 2 years of treatment, IMT was measured in three carotid and two femoral arterial sites by B-mode ultrasound. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline of the combined mean maximum far wall IMT of carotid and femoral arteries, evaluated by repeated measurement analysis of the treatment effect in an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: After 2 years of treatment, amlodipine decreased IMT by 0.089 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.144 to 0.037]. Lisinopril decreased IMT by 0.065 mm (95% CI 0.124 to 0.010). No differences between the two drugs were found (P = 0.18). Both treatment regimens achieved the greatest reduction of IMT after 1 year, with a slight increase after the second year, whereas the reduction in blood pressure was maintained. Comparing the carotid and femoral arteries, a significant treatment difference in the change from baseline in favour of amlodipine was observed in the IMT of the elastic common carotid artery (P < 0.05). The effects of the two drugs on the muscular common femoral artery were not different. CONCLUSION: In a long-term study, amlodipine and lisinopril reduce IMT to a similar extent in newly diagnosed elderly hypertensive patients. It is suggested that the two drugs have different effects on arteries that are not prone to atherosclerosis.
机译:目的:比较钙通道阻滞剂氨氯地平和血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂赖诺普利对未治疗的老年高血压患者内膜中层厚度(IMT)的影响。设计:一项双盲随机平行组试验(ELVERA试验)。患者:研究人群包括166名新诊断的高血压个体(年龄在60-75岁之间),其舒张压介于95和115 mmHg之间,或收缩压介于160和220 mmHg之间,或两者都有。干预:将患者随机分为两组,分别接受氨氯地平5-10 mg或赖诺普利10-20 mg,为期2年。主要观察指标:治疗1年和2年前后,通过B型超声在三个颈动脉和两个股动脉部位测量IMT。主要终点是颈动脉和股动脉的平均最大远壁IMT组合相对于基线的变化,通过意向性治疗分析中对治疗效果的重复测量分析进行评估。结果:治疗2年后,氨氯地平将IMT降低了0.089 mm [95%置信区间(CI)0.144至0.037]。利诺普利可将IMT降低0.065毫米(95%CI 0.124至0.010)。两种药物之间未发现差异(P = 0.18)。两种治疗方案在1年后IMT降幅最大,第二年后IMT略有升高,而血压却保持不变。比较颈动脉和股动脉,在弹性颈总动脉的IMT中观察到在基线变化上有明显的治疗差异,有利于氨氯地平(P <0.05)。两种药物对股总肌总动脉的作用无差异。结论:在一项长期研究中,氨氯地平和赖诺普利在新确诊的老年高血压患者中降低IMT的程度相似。建议这两种药物对不易动脉粥样硬化的动脉有不同的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号