...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Insulin sensitivity following treatment with the alpha 1-blocker bunazosin retard and the beta 1-blocker atenolol in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients.
【24h】

Insulin sensitivity following treatment with the alpha 1-blocker bunazosin retard and the beta 1-blocker atenolol in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients.

机译:在高血压非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者中,使用α1受体阻断剂布那唑嗪缓释剂和β1受体阻断剂阿替洛尔治疗后的胰岛素敏感性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of the alpha 1-blocker bunazosin retard and the beta 1-blocker atenolol (Uniloc) on insulin sensitivity and glucose and lipid homeostasis in patients with type-2 diabetes and hypertension. METHODS: Patients with controlled type-2 diabetes (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus), treated by diet or oral sulphonylurea derivatives, and with mild-to-moderate hypertension were include in a randomized, parallel group, double-blind, multicentre study. After a single-blind placebo run-in period lasting 4-6 weeks, the patients were treated either with bunazosin retard or with atenolol for a further 16 weeks including an initial dose titration period to achieve blood pressure control. Treatment involved 3, 6 or 12 mg bunazosin retard tablets or 25, 50 or 100 mg atenolol tablets, administered orally once a day and prescribed according to blood pressure response. The euglycaemic hyper-insulinaemic clamp technique was used to assess insulin sensitivity both after the placebo period and after the active treatment. A total of 95 patients was enrolled in the study (placebo phase). Forty-eight patients were withdrawn from the placebo phase, mainly due to their blood pressures being outside the required range (seated diastolic blood pressure 90-114 mmHg) and 47 patients were allocated randomly to active treatment. Of these, 23 were administered bunazosin retard and 24 atenolol. All evaluations were on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Insulin sensitivity assessed as glucose utilization during the clamp was significantly higher following bunazosin retard compared with following atenolol administration (3.52 +/- 0.27 versus 2.86 +/- 0.19 units of metabolic clearance rate of glucose index, P < 0.05). The insulin level attained during clamps (infusion rate 56 mU/m2 per min) was higher (P < 0.05) following atenolol (117 +/- 5 mU/l) than it was following bunazosin retard administration (102 +/- 5) or placebo (108 +/- 3), possibly due to an impaired insulin clearance. Compared with placebo, atenolol treatment resulted in significantly increased glucosylated haemoglobin whereas bunazosin retard had no significant effect. The two drugs did not show any consistent differences in lipid profile or fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 levels. During the study seven serious adverse events were reported and one was reported shortly after completion of the study. All except one were classified as not related to the study drug and five of them occurred during placebo treatment. The non-serious side effects were in general considered to be either unrelated to the test drugs or expected effects of the two respective drug classes. Both bunazosin retard and atenolol displayed acceptable safety profiles. CONCLUSION: Bunazosin retard treatment in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients appears to be associated with a slightly higher insulin sensitivity than is atenolol.
机译:目的:比较α1受体阻滞剂布那唑嗪缓释剂和β1受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔(Uniloc)对2型糖尿病和高血压患者胰岛素敏感性以及葡萄糖和脂质稳态的影响。方法:通过饮食或口服磺酰脲类衍生物治疗的2型糖尿病(非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病)可控患者,以及轻度至中度高血压患者,包括在随机,平行分组,双盲,多中心研究中。持续4-6周的单盲安慰剂磨合期后,对患者进行布耐唑嗪缓释剂或阿替洛尔治疗,进一步治疗16周,包括初始剂量滴定期,以实现血压控制。治疗涉及3、6或12毫克布那唑嗪缓释片或25、50或100毫克阿替洛尔片,每天口服一次,并根据血压反应处方。正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹技术用于评估安慰剂期后和积极治疗后的胰岛素敏感性。研究共纳入95位患者(安慰剂阶段)。四十八名患者退出了安慰剂阶段,主要是因为他们的血压超出了所要求的范围(舒张末期血压为90-114 mmHg),并且有47名患者被随机分配进行积极治疗。其中23剂被给予布那唑缓释剂和24剂阿替洛尔。所有评估均基于意向性治疗。结果:在布那唑嗪延迟后,钳夹期间葡萄糖利用的胰岛素敏感性评估明显高于阿替洛尔给药后(3.52 +/- 0.27对2.86 +/- 0.19单位的葡萄糖指数代谢清除率,P <0.05)。阿替洛尔(117 +/- 5 mU / l)钳制期间获得的胰岛素水平(输注速率为每分钟56 mU / m2)高于布那唑嗪缓释给药(102 +/- 5)或更高(P <0.05)安慰剂(108 +/- 3),可能是由于胰岛素清除受损。与安慰剂相比,阿替洛尔治疗导致糖基化血红蛋白显着增加,而布那唑嗪延缓则无明显作用。两种药物在脂质谱或纤维蛋白原和纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂1水平上均未显示出任何一致的差异。在研究期间,报告了7例严重不良事件,在完成研究后不久报告了1例严重不良事件。除一种药物外,所有药物均归类为与研究药物无关,其中五种发生在安慰剂治疗期间。通常认为非严重副作用与试验药物无关,或与两种药物的预期作用无关。布那唑嗪缓释剂和阿替洛尔均显示出可接受的安全性。结论:高血压非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的布那唑嗪延迟治疗似乎与阿替洛尔的胰岛素敏感性略高有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号