...
首页> 外文期刊>Digestion >Lamivudine treatment failure risks in chronic hepatitis b patients with low viral load
【24h】

Lamivudine treatment failure risks in chronic hepatitis b patients with low viral load

机译:拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎病毒载量低的患者失败的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: To analyze the risk factors of lamivudine treatment failure (LTF) for the long-term use in patients with low viral load (LVL). Material and Methods: In this multicenter study, 548 antiviral na?ve noncirrhotic adult patients with LVL (for HBeAg+ patients HBV DNA 109 copies/ml and for HBeAg-patients HBV DNA 107 copies/ml) were enrolled. As a control group, 46 lamivudine-initiated patients with high viral load (HVL) were included. Primary outcome was switching to or adding on another antiviral drug as a consequence of primary nonresponse, partial response, viral breakthrough or adverse events. Secondary outcomes included LTF rates at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years and LTF-related viral and host factors. Results: Among 594 patients, 294 had to change lamivudine at the follow-up. Primary nonresponse, partial response, viral breakthrough or adverse events frequencies were 6.8, 1.6, 64.5 and 0.1%, respectively. Five-year LTF rates were 61.3 and 84.2% in patients with LVL and HVL, respectively. Among patients with LVL, patients with 100,000 copies/ml and ≥100,000 copies/ml had 54.8 and 67.3% LTF rates at the end of the 5th year, respectively. Logistic regression analysis of risk factors showed HBeAg+, hepatic activity index, HBV DNA, virological response at 6 months and duration of follow-up were independent predictors for LTF (p values were 0.001, 0.008, 0.003, 0.020 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusion: Similar to patients with HVL, first-line lamivudine therapy is not efficient for long-term use in patients with LVL. LTF risk is so high even in the absence of worse predictive factors.
机译:目的:分析低病毒载量(LVL)患者长期使用拉米夫定治疗失败(LTF)的危险因素。资料和方法:在这项多中心研究中,纳入了548名抗病毒性非初治非肝硬化成年LVL患者(HBeAg +患者HBV DNA <109拷贝/毫升,HBeAg患者HBV DNA <107拷贝/毫升)。作为对照组,包括46例拉米夫定引发的高病毒载量(HVL)患者。由于主要的无反应,部分反应,病毒突破或不良事件,主要结果是改用或加用另一种抗病毒药。次要结局包括1、2、3、4和5年的LTF率以及与LTF相关的病毒和宿主因素。结果:594例患者中,有294例在随访中必须更换拉米夫定。原发性无反应,部分反应,病毒突破或不良事件发生频率分别为6.8%,1.6%,64.5%和0.1%。 LVL和HVL患者的五年LTF发生率分别为61.3%和84.2%。在LVL患者中,<100,000拷贝/ ml和≥100,000拷贝/ ml的患者在第5年末的LTF发生率分别为54.8%和67.3%。危险因素的Logistic回归分析显示,HBeAg +,肝活动指数,HBV DNA,6个月的病毒学应答和随访时间是LTF的独立预测因子(p值分别为0.001、0.008、0.003、0.020和0.003)。结论:与HVL患者相似,一线拉米夫定疗法对LVL患者长期使用无效。即使没有更坏的预测因素,LTF的风险仍然很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号