【24h】

Muscle specificity in tests of cervical flexor muscle performance

机译:检验颈屈肌性能的肌肉特异性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles are considered to be of substantial clinical importance in the management of neck pain. While conventional cervical flexion (CF) dynamometry methods have been used frequently to assess the capacity of the cervical flexor muscles, it has been suggested that cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) methods may provide a more specific test of DCF muscle performance. This study compared the activation of the deep and superficial cervical flexor muscles between tests of isometric cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) and conventional cervical flexion (CF) dynamometry. Normalised root-mean-square values were recorded for the deep cervical flexor (DCF), sternocleidomastoid (SCM), anterior scalene (AS), and sternohyoid (SH) muscles during isometric CCF and CF tests at maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 50% MVC, and 20% MVC in ten healthy volunteers. The results demonstrated significantly greater electromyography (EMG) amplitude for the SCM (P <.001-002) and AS (P <.001-.001) muscles in the CF test conditions (MVC, 20%MVC, and 50%MVC) compared to CCF test conditions. Moreover, the SH muscle demonstrated significantly greater EMG amplitude during CF compared to CCF but only in the 50% MVC and 20% MVC conditions (P =.007 and .02 respectively). These results demonstrate that dynamometry tests of CF result in greater activity of the superficial cervical flexor muscles compared to tests of CCF. As a result, CCF dynamometry may provide a more specific method to assess and retrain DCF muscle performance, compared to conventional CF in which superficial muscle activity may mask impaired performance of the DCF muscles. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:深颈屈肌(DCF)肌肉被认为在管理颈部疼痛方面具有重要的临床意义。尽管常规的颈屈肌(CF)测力法经常被用于评估颈屈肌的能力,但已建议颅颈屈肌(CCF)方法可提供DCF肌肉性能的更具体测试。这项研究比较了等轴测颈颈屈肌(CCF)和常规颈屈肌(CF)测力的测试之间的深层和浅层颈屈肌的激活。在最大自愿收缩(MVC)的等距CCF和CF测试期间,记录深颈屈肌(DCF),胸锁乳突肌(SCM),前斜角肌(AS)和胸骨舌骨(SH)肌肉的标准化均方根值,50 10名健康志愿者中的MVC百分比和20%MVC。结果表明,在CF测试条件(MVC,20%MVC和50%MVC)下,SCM(P <.001-002)和AS(P <.001-.001)肌肉的肌电图(EMG)幅度明显更大。与CCF测试条件相比。此外,SH肌肉在CF期间的肌电图振幅比CCF显着更大,但仅在50%MVC和20%MVC条件下(分别为P = .007和.02)。这些结果表明,与CCF测试相比,CF的测力测试可导致浅表颈屈肌的活动更大。结果,与传统的CF相比,CCCF测功可以提供一种更具体的方法来评估和训练DCF肌肉的表现,在传统的CF中,浅层肌肉的活动可能掩盖了DCF肌肉的受损。 (C)2005 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号