...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology >Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
【24h】

Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

机译:非静脉曲张和静脉曲张上消化道出血的三种风险评分系统的前瞻性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Aim:Data regarding the efficacy of the Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS), full Rockall score (FRS) and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores (PRS) in comparing non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) are limited. Our aim was to determine the performance of these three risk scores in predicting the need for treatment, mortality, and re-bleeding among patients with non-variceal and variceal UGIB.
机译:背景与目的:关于格拉斯哥布拉奇福德评分(GBS),全罗克洛尔评分(FRS)和内镜下罗克洛尔评分(PRS)在比较非静脉曲张和静脉曲张上消化道出血(UGIB)方面的功效的数据有限。我们的目的是确定这三个风险评分在预测非静脉曲张和静脉曲张UGIB患者的治疗,死亡率和再出血需求中的表现。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号