首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health care for the poor and underserved >Priorities of low-income urban residents for interventions to address the socio-economic determinants of health.
【24h】

Priorities of low-income urban residents for interventions to address the socio-economic determinants of health.

机译:低收入城市居民采取干预措施以解决健康的社会经济决定因素的优先次序。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine the priorities of low-income urban residents for interventions that address the socio-economic determinants of health. METHODS: We selected and estimated the cost of 16 interventions related to education, housing, nutrition, employment, health care, healthy behavior, neighborhood improvement, and transportation. Low-income residents of Washington, D.C. (N=431) participated in decision exercises to prioritize these interventions. RESULTS: Given a budget valued at approximately twice an estimated cost of medical and dental care (Dollars 885), the interventions ultimately prioritized by the greatest percentage of individuals were: health insurance (95%), housing vouchers (82%) dental care (82%), job training (72%), adult education (63%), counseling (68%), healthy behavior incentives (68%), and job placement (67%). The percentages of respondents who received support for housing, adult education, and job training and placement were far less than the percentage who prioritized these interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Poor and low-income residents' priorities may usefully inform allocation of social services that affect health.
机译:目标:确定低收入城市居民的干预重点,以解决健康的社会经济决定因素。方法:我们选择并估算了与教育,住房,营养,就业,保健,健康行为,社区改善和交通运输相关的16种干预措施的费用。华盛顿特区的低收入居民(N = 431)参加了决策练习,以优先考虑这些干预措施。结果:假设预算约为医疗和牙科护理估计费用的两倍(Dollars 885),则最终以最大比例的个人优先考虑的干预措施是:健康保险(95%),住房券(82%)牙科护理( 82%),职业培训(72%),成人教育(63%),咨询(68%),健康行为激励(68%)和工作安置(67%)。获得住房,成人教育,职业培训和就业支持的受访者所占比例远低于优先考虑这些干预措施的所占比例。结论:贫困和低收入居民的优先事项可能会有益地影响影响健康的社会服务的分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号