首页> 外文期刊>Clinical scholars review. >A Rubric for Evaluating-Online Discussion Contributions of Graduate Nursing Students
【24h】

A Rubric for Evaluating-Online Discussion Contributions of Graduate Nursing Students

机译:护理学研究生在线讨论贡献评价规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Online nursing has expanded dramatically over the last 10 years (Lunney & Sammarco, 2009; Roehm 6c Bonnel, 2009; VandeVusse & Hanson, 2000), yet the pedagogical tools that the faculty have at their disposal for discussion guidelines and objective evaluation remain limited. Since 2007, we (the authors) have taught in a collaboratively delivered online doctorate of nursing practice (DNP) program through a four-university consortium in the Midwestern United States. The authors have been involved in curriculum development, course content planning, and teaching in the program since its inception. This consortium has created a venue for free sharing of best practices, experimentation with various delivery models, and creation of innovative solutions to problems germane to online graduate nursing education.
机译:在线护理在过去10年中得到了极大的发展(Lunney&Sammarco,2009; Roehm 6c Bonnel,2009; VandeVusse&Hanson,2000),但是教师可用于讨论准则和客观评估的教学工具仍然有限。自2007年以来,我们(作者)通过美国中西部的四所大学联盟在协作交付的在线在线护理实践博士学位课程(DNP)中进行教学。自计划启动以来,作者一直从事课程开发,课程内容计划和教学工作。该财团创建了一个场所,可以免费共享最佳实践,尝试各种交付模式,以及针对与在线研究生护理教育密切相关的问题创建创新的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号