...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Comparison of Two Methods for Isolating DNA from Human Skeletal Remains for STR Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Two Methods for Isolating DNA from Human Skeletal Remains for STR Analysis

机译:两种从人体骨骼中提取DNA进行STR分析的方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The quality and efficiency of a standard organic DNA isolation method and a silica-based method using the QIAGEN Blood Maxi Kit were compared to obtain human DNA and short tandem repeats (STRs) profiles from 39 exhumed bone samples for paternity testing. DNA samples were quantified by real-time PCR, and STR profiles were obtained using the AmpFlSTR ? Identifiler ? PCR amplification kit. Overall, the silica-based method recovered less DNA ranging from 0 to 147.7ng/g (average 7.57ng/g, median=1.3ng/g) than did the organic method ranging from 0 to 605ng/g (average 44.27ng/g, median=5.8ng/g). Complete profiles (16/16 loci tested) were obtained from 37/39 samples (95%) using the organic method and from 9/39 samples (23%) with the silica-based method. Compared with a standard organic DNA isolation method, our results indicate that the published silica-based method does not improve neither the quality nor the quantity of DNA for STR profiling.
机译:比较了使用QIAGEN Blood Maxi Kit进行的标准有机DNA分离方法和基于二氧化硅的方法的质量和效率,以从39个出土的骨头样品中获得人DNA和短串联重复序列(STRs),以进行亲子鉴定。通过实时PCR对DNA样品进行定量,并使用AmpFlSTRTM获得STR概况。身份识别器? PCR扩增试剂盒。总体而言,基于二氧化硅的方法回收的DNA范围从0至605ng / g(平均7.57ng / g,中位数= 1.3ng / g)要比有机方法的0-605ng / g(平均44.27ng / g)少,中位数= 5.8ng / g)。使用有机方法从37/39样品(95%)获得完整的谱图(测试的16/16位点),使用基于二氧化硅的方法从9/39样品(23%)获得完整的谱图。与标准的有机DNA分离方法相比,我们的结果表明,已公开的基于二氧化硅的方法既不能提高STR谱图的质量,也不能提高DNA的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号