...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Application of fordisc 3.0 to explore differences among crania of north american and south african blacks and whites,
【24h】

Application of fordisc 3.0 to explore differences among crania of north american and south african blacks and whites,

机译:应用Fordisc 3.0探索北美和南非黑人与白人之间的cr骨差异,

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Using discriminant function analysis, classification accuracies for ancestry and sex in white and black South Africans were compared using North American (FDB), African groups in Howells (HDB), and South African (SADB) databases in FORDISC 3.0. (FD3). Twenty-four standard linear measures were collected from a total of 86 black and 101 white crania obtained from the Pretoria Bone Collection. White and black South Africans classified 73% correctly in FDB, 55% correctly in HDB, and 71% correctly in SADB. The percentage of atypical cases was higher with FDB than SADB. In all three databases, misclassification occurred more with sex than ancestry revealing differences in sexual dimorphism between population groups. Broad ancestral differences may explain low misclassification rates for ancestry. FD3, with a modern South African reference sample, can assist South African anthropologists to standardize methodology and to justify procedures for estimating ancestry.
机译:使用判别函数分析,使用FORDISC 3.0中的北美(FDB),Howells(HDB)中的非洲群体和南非(SADB)数据库比较白人和黑人南非人的血统和性别分类准确性。 (FD3)。从比勒陀利亚骨骼收藏中获得的总共86个黑色和101个白色cr骨中收集了二十四个标准线性测量值。南非白人和黑人在FDB中的分类正确率为73%,在HDB中的正确分类为55%,在SADB中的正确分类为71%。 FDB的非典型病例百分比高于SADB。在所有这三个数据库中,性别分类错误比祖先分类错误更多,这揭示了人群之间性别二态性的差异。祖先的广泛差异可能解释了祖先分类错误率低的原因。带有现代南非参考样本的FD3可以帮助南非人类学家标准化方法并证明估算祖先的程序合理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号