首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Evaluation of two instrumental methods of comparing writing paper.
【24h】

Evaluation of two instrumental methods of comparing writing paper.

机译:评价两种比较书写工具的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An organization had approved the sample of writing paper, and accordingly the supplier had to execute the supply. The supply received was suspected to be of different quality from approved one. The organization sent the samples for comparison to the Forensic Science Laboratory. Both the approved and supplied samples were compared using Tensile Testing Method with the Material Testing Machine and Fluorescence and spectral analysis using the Video Spectral Comparator (VSC2000). The difference between the mean loads at peak before rupture in the tensile testing mode for the two samples was about 33%. The two samples differed significantly in terms of UV fluorescence, and there was about 5% average difference in the percentage of maximum reflected intensity in the wavelength region of 400-900 nm. It has been observed in this study that these two methods can adequately distinguish paper samples of different origin.
机译:一个组织已经批准了书写纸的样本,因此供应商必须执行供应。怀疑收到的货品与批准的货品质量不同。该组织将样本进行比较,以供法医学实验室使用。批准的样品和提供的样品均使用材料测试机的拉伸测试方法进行了比较,并使用视频光谱比较器(VSC2000)进行了荧光和光谱分析。在两个样品的拉伸测试模式下,断裂前的峰值平均载荷之间的差异约为33%。这两个样品在紫外线荧光方面有显着差异,并且在400-900 nm的波长区域中最大反射强度的百分比大约有5%的平均差异。在这项研究中已经观察到,这两种方法可以充分地区分不同来源的纸张样本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号