...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, A. Space Physics: JGR >Statistical comparison of isolated and non-isolated auroral substorms
【24h】

Statistical comparison of isolated and non-isolated auroral substorms

机译:孤立和非孤立极光亚暴的统计比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study compares isolated and non-isolated substorms in terms of their global morphology and energy deposition. The analysis is based on a list of geomagnetic substorm onsets identified with magnetometer data from SuperMAG and published previously by Newell and Gjerlove (2011a). Isolated substorms are defined as those with separation of two consecutive onsets no less than 3 h. The auroral data are obtained from the global ultraviolet imager (GUVI) on board the TIMED satellite and are rebinned into typical magnetic latitude-magnetic local time maps. The auroral maps are then averaged in 1 min intervals to show the dynamic change of the aurora. The three phases of the substorm are clearly demonstrated in both isolated and non-isolated substorms. However, there are noticeable differences between the two types of substorms: (1) While the nighttime auroral power for both types of substorms slightly increases in the growth phase, isolated (non-isolated) substorms are associated with smaller (greater) nighttime auroral power. (2) In the expansion phase, isolated substorms are associated with greater and more explosive energy release than non-isolated substorms. (3) The time for the recovery phase is ~2 times longer for isolated than for non-isolated substorms. (4) The winter-to-summer auroral power ratio is approximately constant throughout the three substorm phases and the ratio is larger for isolated (~30%) than that for non-isolated (~10%) substorms. It is also found that the polar cap area increases during the growth phase until ~10 min prior to the magnetic substorm onset and decreases rapidly thereafter. The decrease is found to result from the closure of the nightside polar cap associated with substorm expansion. It is found that the observed differences between the two types of substorms simply reflect the differences in the solar wind and EUV drivers. Thus, we conclude that there is no intrinsic difference between isolated and non-isolated substorms in terms of auroral energy release and subsequent auroral power decay.
机译:本研究从孤立的和非孤立的子风暴的全球形态和能量沉积方面进行比较。该分析基于由SuperMAG的磁力计数据识别并由Newell和Gjerlove(2011a)先前发布的地磁亚暴发作清单。孤立的亚暴定义为连续两次发作间隔不少于3小时的亚暴。极光数据是从TIMED卫星上的全球紫外线成像仪(GUVI)获得的,并重新组合为典型的磁纬度-磁局部时间图。然后将极光图以1分钟的间隔平均,以显示极光的动态变化。在孤立和非孤立的亚暴中都清楚地表明了亚暴的三个阶段。但是,两种类型的亚暴之间存在明显的差异:(1)虽然两种类型的亚暴的夜间极光功率在生长期都略有增加,但孤立的(非孤立的)亚暴与较小的(较大的)夜间极光功率相关。 (2)在扩展阶段,与非孤立的子风暴相比,孤立的子风暴与更大的爆炸能量释放相关。 (3)孤岛恢复阶段的时间比非孤岛亚暴恢复时间长约2倍。 (4)在三个子风暴阶段,冬季与夏季的极光功率比大致恒定,孤立的(〜30%)比非孤立的(〜10%)大。还发现,在生长期直到磁亚暴爆发前的约10分钟为止,极帽面积都增加了,此后迅速减小。发现减少的原因是与亚暴雨扩张有关的夜间极地盖帽的关闭。结果发现,两种亚暴之间观察到的差异仅反映了太阳风和EUV驱动器的差异。因此,我们得出结论,就极光能量释放和随后的极光功率衰减而言,孤立和非孤立的亚暴之间没有内在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号