首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, A. Space Physics: JGR >Centennial variations in sunspot number, open solar flux, and streamer belt width: 1. Correction of the sunspot number record since 1874
【24h】

Centennial variations in sunspot number, open solar flux, and streamer belt width: 1. Correction of the sunspot number record since 1874

机译:黑子数,开阔的太阳通量和流光带宽度的百年变化:1.修正自1874年以来的黑子数记录

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analyze the widely used international/Zürich sunspot number record, R, with a view to quantifying a suspected calibration discontinuity around 1945 (which has been termed the “Waldmeier discontinuity”). We compare R against the composite sunspot group data fromthe Royal Greenwich Observatory network and the Solar Optical Observing Network, using both the number of sunspot groups, N_G, and the total area of the sunspots, A_G. In addition, we compare R with the recently developed interdiurnal variability geomagnetic indices IDV and IDV(1d). In all four cases, linearity of the relationship with R is not assumed and care is taken to ensure that the relationship of each with R is the same before and after the putative calibration change. It is shown the probability that a correction is not needed is of order 10~(-8) and that R is indeed too low before 1945. The optimum correction to R for values before 1945 is found to be 11.6%, 11.7%, 10.3%, and 7.9% using A_G, N_G, IDV, and IDV(1d), respectively. The optimum value obtained by combining the sunspot group data is 11.6% with an uncertainty range 8.1–14.8% at the 2σ level. The geomagnetic indices provide an independent yet less stringent test but do give values that fall within the 2σ uncertainty band with optimum values are slightly lower than from the sunspot group data. The probability of the correction needed being as large as 20%, as advocated by Svalgaard (2011), is shown to be 1.6 × 10~(-5).
机译:我们分析了广泛使用的国际/苏黎世黑子数记录R,以量化1945年左右可疑的校准不连续性(被称为“ Waldmeier不连续性”)。我们使用太阳黑子组的数量N_G和太阳黑子的总面积A_G,将R与来自皇家格林威治天文台网络和太阳光学观测网络的复合太阳黑子组数据进行比较。此外,我们将R与最近开发的昼间变化地磁指数IDV和IDV(1d)进行了比较。在所有四种情况下,均未假定与R的关系呈线性,并且要小心确保在假定的校准更改前后,每个与R的关系相同。结果表明,不需要校正的概率约为10〜(-8),R在1945年之前确实过低。对于1945年之前的值,R的最佳校正为11.6%,11.7%,10.3。 %和7.9%分别使用A_G,N_G,IDV和IDV(1d)。通过合并黑子组数据获得的最佳值为11.6%,在2σ水平的不确定度范围为8.1-14.8%。地磁指数提供了独立但不严格的测试,但确实给出了落入2σ不确定度范围内的值,最佳值略低于黑子群数据中的值。如Svalgaard(2011)所主张的,需要校正的概率高达20%,显示为1.6×10〜(-5)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号