首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geriatric oncology >Management of primary metastatic breast cancer in elderly patients-An international comparison of oncogeriatric versus standard care
【24h】

Management of primary metastatic breast cancer in elderly patients-An international comparison of oncogeriatric versus standard care

机译:老年患者原发性转移性乳腺癌的治疗-老年病和标准治疗的国际比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: An oncogeriatric approach may affect management of elderly patients with breast cancer. However, little is known about oncogeriatric care in the metastatic setting. Therefore, we performed an international comparison of management of elderly patients with primary metastatic disease who were treated in two different care settings. Materials and Methods: Patients who were ≥ 70 years at diagnosis of primary metastatic disease were eligible. The first cohort comprised a population-based cohort of 104 patients (Comprehensive Cancer Center West, The Netherlands), who all received standard care. The second cohort comprised a hospital-based cohort of 42 patients (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Florida, United States), who all received oncogeriatric care. Results: No large differences in patient and tumor characteristics were observed between both cohorts. Most patients in the standard care cohort received systemic therapy as primary therapy, whereas most patients in the oncogeriatric cohort received a combination of systemic and local therapy. Patients in the standard care cohort received fewer lines of treatment (mean number of treatments 2.1 vs. 3.6, p< 0.001), and particularly received less breast surgery, chemotherapy, and trastuzumab. Three-year overall mortality was 71% (95% CI: 61-83%) as compared to 58% (95% CI: 42-75%) among patients in the oncogeriatric care cohort (multivariable HR: 1.59 [95% CI: 0.88-2.87], p= 0.125). Conclusions: In primary metastatic breast cancer, oncogeriatric care intensifies treatment and might improve survival in elderly patients. Future studies on a larger scale should investigate the potential for improved survival, and whether this is accompanied by a better (preservation of) quality of life and functional status.
机译:背景:老年病学方法可能会影响老年乳腺癌患者的治疗。但是,对于转移性环境中的老年医学护理知之甚少。因此,我们进行了国际比较,对在两种不同的护理环境中接受治疗的原发转移性老年患者的管理进行了比较。材料和方法:诊断为原发转移性疾病≥70岁的患者符合条件。第一个队列包括104名患者(荷兰西综合癌症中心)的人群队列,均接受了标准护理。第二个队列由42名患者(美国佛罗里达州的H. Lee Moffitt癌症中心)在医院为基础的队列,均接受了老年医学护理。结果:两个队列之间的患者和肿瘤特征均未观察到较大差异。标准护理队列中的大多数患者接受全身治疗作为主要治疗方法,而老年科队列中的大多数患者则接受全身治疗和局部治疗的组合。标准护理队列中的患者接受较少的治疗(平均治疗次数为2.1 vs. 3.6,p <0.001),尤其是较少接受乳房手术,化学疗法和曲妥珠单抗。老年病护理人群中三年总体死亡率为71%(95%CI:61-83%),而58%(95%CI:42-75%)(多变量HR:1.59 [95%CI: 0.88-2.87],p = 0.125)。结论:在原发性转移性乳腺癌中,老年医学护理可加强治疗,并可能改善老年患者的生存率。未来的大规模研究应探讨提高生存率的潜力,以及是否伴随着更好的(保存)生活质量和功能状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号