...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice >Patient-based evaluations of primary care for cardiovascular diseases: a comparison between conventional and complementary medicine.
【24h】

Patient-based evaluations of primary care for cardiovascular diseases: a comparison between conventional and complementary medicine.

机译:基于患者的心血管疾病初级保健评估:传统医学与辅助医学之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic diseases, including cardiovascular conditions, increasingly rely on complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies. OBJECTIVES: The Swiss Program for Complementary Medicine Evaluation offers a unique opportunity to analyse cardiovascular patients' satisfaction with CAM and conventional medical (COM) therapies. The treatment choices of doctors certified in conventional as well as complementary therapies also could be studied. METHODS: A national observational evaluation on treatment satisfaction of patients consulting COM or CAM doctors. Out of this evaluation project, data related to patients with cardiovascular diseases were specifically analysed for patient satisfaction with treatment and outcome when treated by COM or CAM doctors. RESULTS: Of 199 included doctors (78 COM, 121 CAM) treating cardiovascular patients, COM doctors treated twice as many cardiovascular patients per doctor than CAM doctors. CAM doctors treated less than 1/3 of their cardiovascular patients solely by CAM, while they treated 42% exclusively by COM therapies. Patients seeing a CAM doctor had a significantly longer consultation and were more likely to be highly satisfied with overall treatment outcome and patient-practitioner communication. Moreover, patients seeing a CAM doctor and being treated solely by a CAM therapy more often report 'complete fulfilment of outcome expectation' and 'high overall satisfaction with treatment', although their symptoms less often disappear totally than those of COM therapy-treated patients. CONCLUSION: CAM therapies are not the first treatment choice for cardiovascular diseases. However, even though CAM doctors preferentially apply COM therapies, cardiovascular patients treated by CAM doctors are more likely to be satisfied with the overall treatment outcome, possibly because of the longer and better patient-practitioner interaction.
机译:背景:患有慢性疾病(包括心血管疾病)的患者越来越依赖补充和替代医学(CAM)治疗。目的:瑞士补充医学评估计划为分析心血管疾病患者对CAM和常规医学(COM)疗法的满意度提供了独特的机会。也可以研究获得常规疗法和补充疗法认证的医生的治疗选择。方法:对COM或CAM医生进行咨询的患者对治疗满意度的国家观察评估。在该评估项目中,专门分析了与心血管疾病患者相关的数据,以了解患者对COM或CAM医生治疗和结果的满意度。结果:在199位包括心血管疾病的医生(78位COM,121位CAM)中,COM位医生每位医生治疗的心血管病患者是CAM位医生的两倍。 CAM医生仅通过CAM就治疗了不到1/3的心血管患者,而他们仅通过COM疗法治疗了42%。就诊CAM医生的患者的咨询时间明显更长,并且对总体治疗结果和医患沟通更加满意。此外,就诊CAM医生且仅接受CAM治疗的患者更常报告“完全达到预期结果”和“对治疗的总体满意度较高”,尽管其症状较COM治疗的患者更少见。结论:CAM疗法不是心血管疾病的首选治疗方法。但是,即使CAM医生优先采用COM疗法,但CAM医生所治疗的心血管患者更可能对总体治疗结果感到满意,这可能是因为患者与医生之间的互动时间更长,更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号