...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice >Information-searching behaviors of main and allied health professionals: A nationwide survey in Taiwan
【24h】

Information-searching behaviors of main and allied health professionals: A nationwide survey in Taiwan

机译:主要和专职医疗专业人员的信息搜索行为:台湾的一项全国性调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Rationale, aims and objectives There are a variety of resources to obtain health information, but few studies have examined if main and allied health professionals prefer different methods. The current study was to investigate their information-searching behaviours. Methods A constructed questionnaire survey was conducted from January through April 2011 in nationwide regional hospitals of Taiwan. Questionnaires were mailed to main professionals (physicians and nurses) and allied professionals (pharmacists, physical therapists, technicians and others), with 6160 valid returns collected. Results Among all professional groups, the most commonly used resource for seeking health information was a Web portal, followed by colleague consultations and continuing education. Physicians more often accessed Internet-based professional resources (online databases, electronic journals and electronic books) than the other groups (P < 0.05). In contrast, physical therapists more often accessed printed resources (printed journals and textbooks) than the other specialists (P < 0.05). And nurses, physical therapists and technicians more often asked colleagues and used continuing education than the other groups (P < 0.01). The most commonly used online database was Micromedex for pharmacists and MEDLINE for physicians, technicians and physical therapists. Nurses more often accessed Chinese-language databases rather than English-language databases (P < 0.001). Conclusions This national survey depicts the information-searching pattern of various health professionals. There were significant differences between and within main and allied health professionals in their information searching. The data provide clinical implications for strategies to promote the accessing of evidence-based information.
机译:基本原理,目的和目标有多种获取健康信息的资源,但是很少有研究检查主要和专职医疗专业人员是否喜欢不同的方法。当前的研究是调查他们的信息搜索行为。方法于2011年1月至2011年4月在台湾全国性地区医院进行问卷调查。问卷被邮寄给主要专业人员(医师和护士)和相关专业人员(药剂师,理疗师,技术人员等),并收集了6160份有效回报。结果在所有专业团体中,用于获取健康信息的最常用资源是一个Web门户,其后是同事咨询和继续教育。与其他组相比,医师更经常访问基于Internet的专业资源(在线数据库,电子期刊和电子书)(P <0.05)。相反,物理治疗师比其他专家更经常访问印刷资源(印刷期刊和教科书)(P <0.05)。与护士相比,护士,理疗师和技术人员更经常询问同事并接受继续教育(P <0.01)。最常用的在线数据库是药师的Micromedex和医师,技术人员和理疗师的MEDLINE。护士更常访问中文数据库而不是英文数据库(P <0.001)。结论这项全国调查描绘了各种卫生专业人员的信息搜索模式。主要和专职医疗专业人员之间和内部的信息搜索存在显着差异。数据为促进获取循证信息的策略提供了临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号