...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice >Creating a multidisciplinary low back pain guideline: anatomy of a guideline adaptation process.
【24h】

Creating a multidisciplinary low back pain guideline: anatomy of a guideline adaptation process.

机译:制定多学科的下腰痛指南:指南适应过程的剖析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: A collaborative, multidisciplinary guideline adaptation process was developed to construct a single overarching, evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) for all primary care practitioners responsible for the management of low back pain (LBP) to curb the use of ineffective treatments and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: The adaptation strategy, which involved multiple committees and partnerships, leveraged existing knowledge transfer connections to recruit guideline development group (GDG) members and ensure that all stakeholders had a voice in the guideline development process. Videoconferencing was used to coordinate the large, geographically dispersed GDG. Information services and health technology assessment experts were used throughout the process to lighten the GDG's workload. RESULTS: The GDG reviewed seven seed guidelines and drafted an Alberta-specific guideline during 10 half-day meetings over a 12-month period. The use of ad hoc subcommittees to resolve uncertainties or disagreements regarding evidence interpretation expedited the process. Challenges were encountered in dealing with subjectivity, guideline appraisal tools, evidence source limitations and inconsistencies, and the lack of sophisticated evidence analysis inherent in guideline adaptation. Strategies for overcoming these difficulties are discussed. CONCLUSION: Guideline adaptation is useful when resources are limited and good-quality seed CPGs exist. The Ambassador Program successfully utilized existing stakeholder interest to create an overarching guideline that aligned guidance for LBP management across multiple primary care disciplines. Unforeseen challenges in guideline adaptation can be overcome with credible seed guidelines, a consistently applied and transparent methodology, and clear documentation of the subjective contextualization process. Multidisciplinary stakeholder input and an open, trusting relationship among all contributors will ensure that the end product is clinically meaningful.
机译:理由,目标和目标:开发了一种协作的,多学科的指南适应过程,以为负责下腰痛(LBP)管理的所有初级保健从业者构建单一的,循证的临床实践指南(CPG)。无效的治疗方法并改善患者预后。方法:涉及多个委员会和伙伴关系的适应策略利用现有的知识转移联系来招募指南制定小组(GDG)成员,并确保所有利益相关者在指南制定过​​程中都有发言权。电视会议用于协调地理上分散的大型GDG。在整个过程中,都使用了信息服务和卫生技术评估专家来减轻GDG的工作量。结果:GDG审查了七个种子准则,并在12个月的10个半天会议中起草了针对Alberta的准则。使用特设小组委员会解决有关证据解释的不确定性或分歧,加快了这一过程。在处理主观性,指南评估工具,证据来源的局限性和不一致之处以及指南适应性内在缺乏复杂的证据分析方面遇到了挑战。讨论了克服这些困难的策略。结论:当资源有限且存在优质种子CPG时,指南适应性很有用。大使计划成功地利用了利益相关者的现有利益,创建了一个总体指导方针,该指导方针使跨多个初级保健学科的LBP管理的指导方针保持一致。可以通过可靠的种子指南,始终如一地应用和透明的方法以及对主观情境化过程的清晰记录来克服指南适应中无法预见的挑战。多学科利益相关者的投入以及所有贡献者之间开放,信任的关系将确保最终产品具有临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号