...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Industrial Training: A Journal for HRD Specialists >Competence across Europe: highest common factor or lowest common denominator?
【24h】

Competence across Europe: highest common factor or lowest common denominator?

机译:欧洲的竞争力:最高公因数还是最低公分母?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this article is to explore diversity in competence models across Europe and consider the extent to which there is sufficient common ground for a common European approach to underpin the European Qualifications Framework. Design/methodology/approach - The paper uses a literature review and interviews with policy makers. Findings - Despite the central role of competence in policy initiatives, conceptual approaches to competence vary not only between but also within different member states. This diversity embodies not only language issues but also fundamental cultural differences in approaches to skill formation. Whether the models have sufficient common ground to permit a "best-fit" European-wide approach is open to question, although this is clearly an essential prerequisite for removing barriers to labour mobility. Despite initiatives like the European Qualifications Framework there is still no consensus for adopting a common competence model and policy discussions continue to reveal confusion. Research limitations/implications - The focus on policy discussions at the European level may be a limitation, and readers should see this as the introductory scene setting to more detailed discussions in the following papers of important developments within member states. Beyond this, much is happening at the level of sectors and occupations that is the focus for practical implementation. Practical implications - The paper highlights the urgent need to develop a coherent conceptual underpinning for competence descriptors in qualifications frameworks that will work as a best-fit approach across Europe. Without this, occupational and inter-sector mobility will be hindered. Originality/value - The paper offers the most comprehensive assessment of European approaches to competence to date.
机译:目的-本文的目的是探索整个欧洲能力模型的多样性,并考虑在何种程度上有足够的共同基础来采用通用的欧洲方法来支撑《欧洲资格框架》。设计/方法/方法-本文使用文献回顾和对政策制定者的访谈。调查结果-尽管权限在政策计划中发挥着核心作用,但权限的概念性方法不仅在成员国之间而且在不同成员国之间也有所不同。这种多样性不仅体现了语言问题,还体现了技能形成方法上的根本文化差异。这些模型是否具有足够的共同基础,以允许在欧洲范围内采用“最适合”的方法,这值得商question,尽管这显然是消除劳动力流动障碍的必要前提。尽管采取了诸如“欧洲资格认证框架”之类的举措,但仍未就采用通用能力模型达成共识,并且政策讨论继续显示出困惑。研究的局限性/含义-在欧洲层面上对政策讨论的关注可能是一个局限,读者应将其视为在随后的论文中对成员国内部重要发展进行更详细讨论的介绍性背景。除此之外,实际执行的重点是部门和职业。实际意义-本文强调了迫切需要为资格框架中的能力描述符开发一个一致的概念基础,该框架将成为欧洲范围内最适合的方法。没有这一点,将阻碍职业和部门间的流动。原创性/价值-本文提供了迄今为止欧洲能力方法的最全面评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号