首页> 外文期刊>Journal of generic medicines >Sanofi-Aventis et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al.: The one hundred eight million dollar question
【24h】

Sanofi-Aventis et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al.: The one hundred eight million dollar question

机译:Sanofi-Aventis等。诉Apotex Inc.等人:一亿八千万美元的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In Sanofi-Aventis et al. v. Apotex, Inc. et al., 659 F.3d 1171(Fed. Cir. 2011], the Federal Circuit reversed a Lower court's grant of prejudgment interest to Sanofi in view of a settlement agreement between the parties, affirmed the lower court's determination that Canadian-based Apotex Inc. was jointly and severally liable with American-based Apotex Corp. for all damages and denied a motion of Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. for leave to amend to add an affirmative defense of patent misuse and a counterclaim for breach of contract. Regarding the denial of prejudgment interest in the amount of $107,930,857, the Federal Circuit found that the term"actual damages" in the settlement agreement included all the damages to which Sanofi was entitled. This decision, accordingly, highlights the importance of drafting carefully crafted settlement agreements.
机译:在Sanofi-Aventis等人中。 v。Apotex,Inc.等人,659 F.3d 1171(联邦法院,2011年),鉴于当事双方之间达成和解协议,联邦巡回法院撤销了下级法院对赛诺菲的判决前利息的授予,确认了下级法院的判决。确定加拿大的Apotex Inc.与美国的Apotex Corp.共同承担连带赔偿责任,并驳回Apotex Inc.和Apotex Corp.的动议以修改其许可以增加对专利滥用和反诉的肯定性辩护关于拒绝判给判决前利息107,930,857美元,联邦巡回法院认为和解协议中的“实际损害赔偿”一词包括了赛诺菲有权获得的所有损害赔偿,因此,该决定凸显了重要性起草精心设计的和解协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号