...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rheumatology >Joint lavage associated with triamcinolone hexacetonide injection in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind controlled study.
【24h】

Joint lavage associated with triamcinolone hexacetonide injection in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind controlled study.

机译:联合注射曲安奈德己烯酮治疗膝关节骨性关节炎:一项随机双盲对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Compare the medium-term effectiveness and tolerance between joint lavage (JL) in combination with triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) intra-articular injection (IAI) and IAI with TH alone for treatment of primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. A randomized, double-blind, controlled study was carried out on 60 patients with primary OA of the knee, randomized into two intervention groups: JL/TH group, joint lavage in combination with TH intra-articular injection and TH group, TH intra-articular injection. Patients were followed for 12 weeks by a blind observer using the following outcome measurements: visual analogue scale for pain at rest and in movement, goniometry, WOMAC, Lequesne's index, timed 50-ft walk, perception of improvement, Likert scale for improvement assessment, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and analgesics, and local side effects. There were no statistical differences in the inter-group analysis for any of the variables studied over the 12-week period. Although both groups demonstrated statistical improvement in the intra-group evaluation (except for Likert scale according to patient and the use of anti-inflammatory drugs). In the Kellgren-Lawrence scale (KL) 2 and 3 sub-analysis, there was a statistical difference regarding joint flexion among patients classified as KL 2, favoring the TH group (p=0.03). For the KL 3 patients, there were statistical differences favoring the JL/TH group regarding Lequesne (p=0.021), WOMAC pain score (p=0.01), and Likert scale according to the patient (p=0.028) and the physician (p=0.034). The combination of joint lavage and IAI with TH was not more effective than IAI with TH alone in the treatment of primary OA of the knee. However, KL 3 patients may receive a major benefit from this combination.
机译:比较关节灌洗(JL)联合曲安奈德(THI)关节内注射(IAI)和IAI单独使用TH治疗膝关节原发性骨关节炎(OA)的中期疗效和耐受性。对60例膝原发性OA患者进行了一项随机,双盲,对照研究,随机分为两个干预组:JL / TH组,联合灌洗联合TH关节内注射和TH组,TH联合应用。关节注射。盲人观察者对患者进行了12周的随访,结果如下:静止和运动中疼痛的视觉模拟量表,测角法,WOMAC,Lequesne指数,定时行走50英尺,对改善的感知,用于改善评估的李克特量表,使用非甾体抗炎药和镇痛药,以及局部副作用。组间分析在12周内研究的任何变量均无统计学差异。尽管两组均在组内评估中显示出统计学上的改善(根据患者的李克特量表和使用抗炎药除外)。在Kellgren-Lawrence量表(KL)2和3子分析中,分类为KL 2的患者之间的关节屈曲存在统计学差异,青睐TH组(p = 0.03)。对于KL 3病人,根据患者(p = 0.028)和医师(p),Lequesne(p = 0.021),WOMAC疼痛评分(p = 0.01)和Likert量表存在有利于JL / TH组的统计学差异。 = 0.034)。联合灌洗和IAI与TH联合使用在单独治疗IOA膝关节方面没有比单独IAI与TH联合使用更有效。但是,KL 3患者可能会从这种联合治疗中受益匪浅。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号