首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental zoology, Part A. Comparative experimental biology >Responses to chemical cues from animal and plant foods by actively foraging insectivorous and omnivorous scincine lizards.
【24h】

Responses to chemical cues from animal and plant foods by actively foraging insectivorous and omnivorous scincine lizards.

机译:通过积极觅食食虫性和杂食性辛辛基蜥蜴,对动植物食品中化学线索的反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

If tongue-flicking is important to lizards to sample chemical cues permitting identification of foods, tongue-flicking and subsequent feeding responses should be adjusted to match diet. This hypothesis can be examined for plant foods because most lizards are insectivores, but herbivory/omnivory has evolved independently in many lizard taxa. Here we present experimental data on chemosensory responses to chemical cues from animal prey and palatable plants by three species of the scincine lizards. When tested with chemical stimuli presented on cotton swabs, the insectivorous Eumeces fasciatus responded strongly to prey chemicals but not to chemicals from plants palatable to omnivorous lizards or to pungent or odorless control stimuli. Two omnivorous species, E. schneideri and Scincus mitranus, responded more strongly to chemical cues from both prey and food plants than to the control chemicals. All available data for actively foraging lizards, including these skinks, show that they are capable of prey chemical discrimination, and insectivores do not exhibit elevated tongue-flicking or biting responses to chemical cues from palatable plants. In all of the several species of herbivores/omnivores tested, the lizards show elevated responses to both animal and plant chemicals. We suggest two independent origins of both omnivory and plant chemical discrimination that may account for the evolution of diet and food chemical discriminations in the eight species of skinks studied, five of which are omnivores. All data are consistent with the hypothesis that acquisition of omnivory is accompanied by acquisition of plant chemical discrimination, but data on a broad diversity of taxa are needed for a definitive comparative test of the evolutionary hypothesis. J. Exp. Zool. 287:327-339, 2000. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:如果甩舌对蜥蜴来说很重要,以便取样化学线索以识别食物,则应调整甩舌和随后的喂养反应以配合饮食。可以针对植物性食品检验此假设,因为大多数蜥蜴是食虫类动物,但是在许多蜥蜴类群中,食草/杂食性动物已经独立进化。在这里,我们介绍了三种物种的辛辛那克蜥蜴对动物猎物和可口植物对化学线索的化学感应响应的实验数据。用棉签上的化学刺激物进行测试时,食虫性菊苣对ume类化学物质反应强烈,但对可口的杂食蜥蜴或刺激性或无味的控制刺激物中的植物化学物质没有强烈反应。 schneideri和Scincus mitranus这两个杂食性物种对猎物和食用植物的化学信号的反应比对对照化学物质的反应强。主动觅食蜥蜴的所有可用数据(包括这些石皮鱼)都表明,它们能够捕食化学物质,而食虫动物并未表现出对可口植物化学线索的猛烈甩舌或咬人反应。在所测试的所有几种食草动物/杂食动物中,蜥蜴对动植物的化学反应均升高。我们建议杂食动物和植物化学歧视的两个独立起源,这可能解释了所研究的八种石皮鱼中饮食和食品化学歧视的演变,其中五种是杂食动物。所有数据均与杂食性获取伴随着植物化学歧视性获取这一假设相一致,但是对于进化假设的确定性比较检验,需要广泛的分类单元数据。 J. Exp。 Zool。 287:327-339,2000。版权所有2000 Wiley-Liss,Inc.。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号