首页> 外文期刊>Clinical transplantation. >Piggyback technique and selective use of veno-venous bypass in adult orthotopic liver transplantation.
【24h】

Piggyback technique and selective use of veno-venous bypass in adult orthotopic liver transplantation.

机译:成人原位肝移植的肩扛技术和静脉-静脉旁路的选择性使用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The piggyback technique (PT), with preservation of the cava, is being used more frequently in adult orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The advantages of PT include hemodynamic stability during the anhepatic phase without a large-volume fluid infusion and obviating the need for veno-venous bypass (VVB). At our center, we changed our practice in July 1997 from the standard technique (ST) of OLT with routine use of VVB to PT and selective use of VVB. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the results with the two different practices, ST-routine VVB versus PT-selective VVB. METHODS: Forty OLTs were performed during the period July 1995 July 1997 using ST-routine VVB (group I) and 36 during August 1997-December 1998 using PT-selective VVB (group II). The etiology of liver disease was similar in the two groups, with hepatitis C and alcoholic liver disease accounting for half of the patients in each group. The UNOS status, age, sex, and percentage of patients with previous upper abdominal surgery were also similar between the two groups. RESULTS: In the PT-selective VVB era (group II), 34/36 patients (94%) underwent OLT with PT and VVB was used for 8 (22%) patients. The decision to use VVB was elective for 3 patients (fulminant hepatic failure, 2; severe portal hypertension, 1) and urgent for 5 patients (hemodynamic instability during hepatectomy). The intraoperative use of packed red blood cells (PRBC) (mean +/- SD) was 15+/-12 units for group I and 9+/-8 units for group II (p = 0.023). Anastomosis time and total operating time (mean +/- SD) were 91 + 30 min and 9.5+/-3.2 h, respectively, for group I patients compared with 52+/-28 min and 7.6+/-1.6 h, respectively, for group II patients (p<0.0001 and 0.002, respectively). Median post-operative stays in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital were 5 and 17 d, respectively, for group I and 4 and 11 d, respectively, for group II (p = NS). Mean serum creatinine on day 3 was similar in the two groups. Median hospital charges for group I patients were
机译:背景:具有腔静脉保护功能的背back式技术(PT)在成人原位肝移植(OLT)中越来越频繁地使用。 PT的优势包括在无大量输液的情况下在肝期的血流动力学稳定性,并且无需进行静脉-静脉旁路(VVB)。在我们中心,我们于1997年7月将惯例从OLT的标准技术(ST)改为常规使用VVB改为PT并选择性使用VVB。本研究的目的是分析两种不同方法的结果,即ST常规VVB与PT选择性VVB。方法:在1995年7月至1997年7月期间使用ST例程VVB(I组)进行了40次OLT,在1997年8月至1998年12月使用PT选择性VVB(II组)进行了36次。两组的肝病病因相似,丙型肝炎和酒精性肝病占每组患者的一半。两组之间的UNOS状态,年龄,性别和接受过上腹部手术的患者百分比也相似。结果:在PT选择性VVB时代(第二组)中,对34/36例患者(94%)进行了OLT PT手术,其中VVB用于8例(22%)患者。 VVB的使用决定为3例患者(严重肝衰竭2例;严重门脉高压1例),紧急5例患者(肝切除术期间血流动力学不稳定)。 I组术中使用压缩红细胞(PRBC)(平均+/- SD)为15 +/- 12单位,II组为9 +/- 8单位(p = 0.023)。 I组患者的吻合时间和总手术时间(平均+/- SD)分别为91 + 30分钟和9.5 +/- 3.2 h,而第一组患者分别为52 +/- 28 min和7.6 +/- 1.6 h,对于第二组患者(分别为p <0.0001和0.002)。 I组的重症监护病房(ICU)和医院的中位术后停留时间分别为5 d和17 d,II组的中位术后停留时间分别为4 d和11 d(p = NS)。两组在第3天的平均血清肌酐相似。第一组患者的住院费用中位数为

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号