首页> 外文期刊>Clinical trials: journal of the Society for Clinical Trials >Risk-stratified imputation in survival analysis
【24h】

Risk-stratified imputation in survival analysis

机译:生存分析中的风险分层归因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Censoring that is dependent on covariates associated with survival can arise in randomized trials due to changes in recruitment and eligibility criteria to minimize withdrawals, potentially leading to biased treatment effect estimates. Imputation approaches have been proposed to address censoring in survival analysis; while these approaches may provide unbiased estimates of treatment effects, imputation of a large number of outcomes may over- or underestimate the associated variance based on the imputation pool selected. Purpose We propose an improved method, risk-stratified imputation, as an alternative to address withdrawal related to the risk of events in the context of time-toevent analyses. Methods Our algorithm performs imputation from a pool of replacement subjects with similar values of both treatment and covariate(s) of interest, that is, from a riskstratified sample. This stratification prior to imputation addresses the requirement of time-to-event analysis that censored observations are representative of all other observations in the risk group with similar exposure variables. We compared our risk-stratified imputation to case deletion and bootstrap imputation in a simulated dataset in which the covariate of interest (study withdrawal) was related to treatment. A motivating example from a recent clinical trial is also presented to demonstrate the utility of our method. Results In our simulations, risk-stratified imputation gives estimates of treatment effect comparable to bootstrap and auxiliary variable imputation while avoiding inaccuracies of the latter two in estimating the associated variance. Similar results were obtained in analysis of clinical trial data. Limitations Risk-stratified imputation has little advantage over other imputation methods when covariates of interest are not related to treatment. Risk-stratified imputation is intended for categorical covariates and may be sensitive to the width of the matching window if continuous covariates are used. Conclusions The use of the risk-stratified imputation should facilitate the analysis of many clinical trials, in which one group has a higher withdrawal rate that is related to treatment.
机译:在随机试验中,由于招募和资格标准的变化(使撤回率降至最低),可能会出现依赖与生存率相关的协变量的背景检查,这可能导致治疗效果估计偏倚。有人提出了插补方法来解决生存分析中的审查问题。尽管这些方法可以提供对治疗效果的无偏估计,但基于所选的归因库,对大量结果的估算可能会高估或低估相关的方差。目的我们提出了一种改进的方法,即风险分层归因,作为在时间到事件分析的背景下解决与事件风险相关的退出的替代方法。方法我们的算法从一组具有相似治疗值和相关协变量值的替代受试者中进行插补,即从经过风险追踪的样本中进行估算。插补前的这种分层解决了事件进行时间分析的要求,即经过审查的观测值可以代表风险组中具有相似暴露变量的所有其他观测值。我们在模拟的数据集中比较了风险分层归因与案例删除和自举归因,其中感兴趣的协变量(研究退出)与治疗相关。还提供了一个来自最近临床试验的激励性例子,以证明我们方法的实用性。结果在我们的模拟中,风险分层估算可得出与自举和辅助变量估算可比的治疗效果估算,同时避免了后两者在估算相关方差时的不准确性。在临床试验数据分析中获得了类似的结果。局限性当感兴趣的协变量与治疗无关时,风险分层估算比其他估算方法没有什么优势。风险分层的估算旨在用于类别协变量,如果使用连续协变量,则可能对匹配窗口的宽度敏感。结论使用风险分层估算法应有助于对许多临床试验进行分析,其中一组与治疗有关的退出率较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号