...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evolutionary biology >Playing smart vs. playing safe: the joint expression of phenotypic plasticity and potential bet hedging across and within thermal environments
【24h】

Playing smart vs. playing safe: the joint expression of phenotypic plasticity and potential bet hedging across and within thermal environments

机译:玩智能与玩安全:表型可塑性与热环境中及内部潜在对冲的共同表达

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adaptive phenotypic plasticity evolves when cues reliably predict fitness consequences of life-history decisions, whereas bet hedging evolves when environments are unpredictable. These modes of response should be jointly expressed, because environmental variance is composed of both predictable and unpredictable components. However, little attention has been paid to the joint expression of plasticity and bet hedging. Here, I examine the simultaneous expression of plasticity in germination rate and two potential bethedging traits - germination fraction and within-season diversification in timing of germination - in seeds from multiple seed families of five geographically distant populations of Lobelia inflata (L.) subjected to a thermal gradient. Populations differ in germination plasticity to temperature, in total germination fraction and in the expression of potential diversification in the timing of germination. The observation of a negative partial correlation between the expression of plasticity and germination variance (potential diversification), and a positive correlation between plasticity and germination fraction is suggestive of a trade-off between modes of response to environmental variance. If the observed correlations are indicative of those between adaptive plasticity and bet hedging, we expect an optimal balance to exist and differ among populations. I discuss the challenges involved in testing whether the balance between plasticity and bet hedging depends on the relative predictability of environmental variance.
机译:当提示可靠地预测了生命历史决策的适应性后果时,适应性表型可塑性就发生了变化;而当环境无法预测时,对冲风险就发生了。由于环境变化是由可预测和不可预测组成的,因此应共同表达这些响应方式。但是,很少有人关注可塑性和对冲的联合表达。在这里,我研究了来自五个不同地理种群的山梗菜(Lobelia inflata(L.))的多个种子家族的种子中发芽率的可塑性同时表达,以及两个潜在的发芽特性(发芽率和季节内季节变化)。热梯度。种群在发芽对温度的可塑性,总发芽率以及发芽时机中潜在的多样化表达方面有所不同。观察到可塑性和发芽差异表达之间的负偏相关(潜在的多样化),以及可塑性和发芽分数之间呈正相关,这表明在对环境差异的响应方式之间进行了权衡。如果观察到的相关性指示适应性可塑性和投注对冲之间的相关性,则我们期望群体之间存在最佳平衡并有所不同。我讨论了测试可塑性和对冲之间的平衡是否取决于环境变化的相对可预测性所涉及的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号