首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >A post hoc analysis of the impact on hostility and agitation of quetiapine and haloperidol among patients with schizophrenia.
【24h】

A post hoc analysis of the impact on hostility and agitation of quetiapine and haloperidol among patients with schizophrenia.

机译:对精神分裂症患者中喹硫平和氟哌啶醇对敌对性和躁动的影响进行事后分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Quetiapine, a drug with a broad pharmacologic profile (similar to that of clozapine), may show benefits for agitation in patients with psychoses. Also, quetiapine may be superior to placebo and either equal or superior to haloperidol in treating this symptom. Available data for other second-generation antipsychotic agents show that quetiapine may have better efficacy in improving agitation compared with haloperidol. OBJECTIVE: This reanalysis of a previously reported pivotal clinical trial assessed whether quetiapine or haloperidol has benefits for the treatment of hostility and agitation among patients experiencing an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 65 years of either sex and any ethnicity who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition criteria and who were experiencing an acute exacerbation were recruited into the study. A priori, data from patients assigned to 4 therapeutically effective quetiapine treatment groups (150, 300, 600, and 750 mg) in a previously reported 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial were combined and compared with data from patients given haloperidol 12 mg or placebo on an agitation measure derived from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Patients who received at least 2 weeks of treatment who had a baseline assessment and at least 1 postbaseline assessment after the 2 weeks of treatment were included. An analysis of variance with the baseline hostility score and center as covariates was used to assess treatment effects of quetiapine or haloperidol versus placebo for changes in agitation scores. A path analysis was used to separate the direct from the indirect effects (via improvements in psychoses and/or overall psychopathology) on agitation scores of quetiapine relative to haloperidol. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients (193 men, 64 women) were studied. The combined quetiapine groups comprised 175 patients; the haloperidol group, 42 patients; and the placebo group, 40 patients. Quetiapine treatment reduced agitation scores significantly among patients with acute psychoses compared with placebo. A slight reduction in agitation scores was found when haloperidol treatment was compared with placebo, but this difference was not statistically significant. Compared with haloperidol, quetiapine treatment had a direct and significant effect on agitation that was independent of the improvement in psychotic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The data in this study suggest that quetiapine treatment has benefits for hostility and agitation among patients experiencing an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Furthermore, the path analysis indicated that, relative to haloperidol, quetiapine appeared to have direct effects on agitation that were independent of improvements in psychoses or overall psychopathology, as assessed by the BPRS.
机译:背景:喹硫平是一种具有广泛药理学特性(类似于氯氮平的药物)的药物,可能对精神病患者的躁动表现出益处。同样,喹硫平在治疗这种症状时可能优于安慰剂,并且与氟哌啶醇相等或更好。其他第二代抗精神病药的可用数据表明,喹硫平与氟哌啶醇相比在改善躁动方面可能有更好的功效。目的:这项对先前报道的重要临床试验的重新分析评估了喹硫平或氟哌啶醇是否对治疗精神分裂症急性加重的患者的敌对和躁动有益处。方法:将根据《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》(修订版第三版标准)诊断为精神分裂症的18岁至65岁的性别和任何种族的患者纳入研究。先验地,将先前报道的为期6周,双盲,安慰剂对照的临床试验中分配给4个治疗有效的喹硫平治疗组(150、300、600和750 mg)的患者的数据进行合并,并与患者数据进行比较服用氟哌啶醇12 mg或安慰剂,并根据《简易精神病学量表》(BPRS)进行激动。纳入接受至少2周治疗的患者,在2周治疗后进行了基线评估和至少1次基线后评估。使用基线敌对度得分和中心作为协变量的方差分析来评估喹硫平或氟哌啶醇与安慰剂的治疗效果,以评估激动评分的变化。路径分析用于区分喹硫平相对于氟哌啶醇的激动分数的直接影响与间接影响(通过改善精神病和/或整体心理病理)。结果:总共研究了257例患者(193例男性,64例女性)。喹硫平合并组包括175例患者;氟哌啶醇组42例;安慰剂组40例。与安慰剂相比,急性精神病患者的喹硫平治疗显着降低了躁动评分。当氟哌啶醇治疗与安慰剂比较时,发现躁动评分略有降低,但这一差异在统计学上并不显着。与氟哌啶醇相比,喹硫平治疗对躁动具有直接而显着的影响,而与精神病症状的改善无关。结论:本研究的数据表明喹硫平治疗对精神分裂症急性加重的患者的敌意和激动有好处。此外,路径分析表明,相对于氟哌啶醇,喹硫平似乎对躁动具有直接影响,而这与BPRS评估的精神病或整体精神病理学改善无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号