首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Impact of quetiapine on resolution of individual delirium symptoms in critically ill patients with delirium: a post-hoc analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
【24h】

Impact of quetiapine on resolution of individual delirium symptoms in critically ill patients with delirium: a post-hoc analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

机译:喹硫平对危重with妄患者个体del妄症状缓解的影响:一项双盲,随机,安慰剂对照研究的事后分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

IntroductionWe hypothesized that delirium symptoms may respond differently to antipsychotic therapy. The purpose of this paper was to retrospectively compare duration and time to first resolution of individual delirium symptoms from the database of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing quetiapine (Q) or placebo (P), both with haloperidol rescue, for critically ill patients with delirium.MethodsData for 10 delirium symptoms from the eight-domain, intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) previously collected every 12 hours were extracted for 29 study patients. Data between the Q and P groups were compared using a cut-off P-value of ≤0.10 for this exploratory study.ResultsBaseline ICDSC scores (5 (4 to 7) (Q) vs 5 (4 to 6)) (median, interquartile range (IQR)) and % of patients with each ICDSC symptom were similar in the two groups (all P > 0.10). Among patients with the delirium symptom at baseline, use of Q may lead to a shorter time (days) to first resolution of symptom fluctuation (4 (Q) vs. 14, P = 0.004), inattention (3 vs. 8, P = .10) and disorientation (2 vs. 10, P = 0.10) but a longer time to first resolution of agitation (3 vs. 1, P = 0.04) and hyperactivity (5 vs. 1, P = 0.07). Among all patients, Q-treated patients tended to spend a smaller percent of time with inattention (47 (0 to 67) vs. 78 (43 to 100), P = 0.025), hallucinations (0 (0 to 17) vs. 28 (0 to 43), P = 0.10) and symptom fluctuation (47 (19 to 67) vs. 89 (33 to 00), P = 0.04] and there was a trend for Q-treated patients to spend a greater percent of time at an appropriate level of consciousness (26% (13 to 63%) vs. 14% (0 to 33%), P = 0.17].ConclusionsOur exploratory analysis suggests that quetiapine may resolve several intensive care unit (ICU) delirium symptoms faster than the placebo. Individual symptom resolution appears to differ in association with the pharmacologic intervention (that is, P vs Q, both with as needed haloperidol). Future studies evaluating antipsychotics in ICU patients with delirium should measure duration and resolution of individual delirium symptoms and their relation to long-term outcomes.
机译:引言我们假设del妄症状可能对抗精神病药物疗法有不同的反应。本文的目的是从一项比较喹硫平(Q)或安慰剂(P)与氟哌啶醇抢救,方法从先前每12小时收集的8个域的重症监护ir妄检查清单(ICDSC)中提取10个del妄症状的数据,用于29位研究患者。在该探索性研究中,Q和P组之间的数据使用截止P值≤0.10进行了比较。结果基线ICDSC评分(5(4至7)(Q)vs 5(4至6))(中位数,四分位数)两组(ICRSC)范围和每种ICDSC症状的患者百分比相似(均P> 0.10)。在基线时出现del妄症状的患者中,使用Q可能会缩短症状波动首次得到解决的时间(天)(4(Q)vs. 14,P = 0.004),注意力不集中(3 vs. 8,P = 0.004) .10)和迷失方向(2 vs. 10,P = 0.10),但是第一次达到搅动的分辨率(3 vs. 1,P = 0.04)和活动亢进(5 vs. 1,P = 0.07)的时间较长。在所有患者中,接受Q治疗的患者在注意力不集中的时间上所占比例较小(47(0至67)比78(43至100),P = 0.025),幻觉(0(0至17)与28)。 (0至43),P = 0.10)和症状波动(47(19至67)vs. 89(33至00),P = 0.04],接受Q治疗的患者有花费更多时间的趋势在适当的意识水平下(26%(13%至63%)对14%(0%至33%),P = 0.17]。结论我们的探索性分析表明,喹硫平可能比以下方法更快地解决了多个重症监护病房(ICU)的ir妄症状。个别症状的缓解似乎与药物干预有关(即P vs Q,均与氟哌啶醇配合使用)未来评估ICU del妄患者抗精神病药物的研究应测量持续时间和个别del妄症状及其缓解的方法与长期结果有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号