首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study.
【24h】

Antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study.

机译:各种根管制备技术的抗菌功效:一项体外比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, we compared the antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques and instruments in the root canals of 40 human first maxillary premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons. After extirpation of the pulp, teeth were sterilized in an autoclave. Then, the root canals were infected with Enterococcus faecalis suspension and the teeth incubated at 37 degrees C for 24 h. Thereafter, the teeth were divided into five groups: preparation with K-file or K-Nitiflex file (step-back technique; groups 1 and 2), K-reamer (standardization technique; group 3), irrigation only (group 4), and no treatment (group 5). Before and after treatments, samples were taken for culture. Results were evaluated after 24-h incubation in E67 selective culture medium. We observed a considerable reduction in bacterial population after mechanical preparation. No significant differences were seen among the efficacy of the various preparation techniques and files used.
机译:在这项研究中,我们比较了由于正畸原因而提取的40条人类第一根上颌前磨牙的根管中各种根管制备技术和仪器的抗菌功效。去除牙髓后,将牙齿在高压灭菌器中消毒。然后,用粪肠球菌悬浮液感染根管并将牙齿在37摄氏度下孵育24小时。此后,将牙齿分为五组:使用K锉或K-Nitiflex锉(后退技术;第1和2组),K扩孔器(标准化技术;第3组),仅冲洗(第4组),且不接受治疗(第5组)。处理之前和之后,取样进行培养。在E67选择性培养基中孵育24小时后,评估结果。我们观察到机械制备后细菌数量显着减少。在使用的各种制备技术和文件的功效之间未见明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号