...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
【24h】

A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.

机译:在使用次氯酸钠凝胶和溶液形式作为根管冲洗液后,对涂片层进行了比较扫描电子显微镜研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The effect of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) gel along with EDTA on the removal of the smear layer has not been studied; therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of gel and solution forms of NaOCl in removal of the smear layer from root canal walls. METHODS: A total of 40 single-rooted teeth with minimum curvature (<5 degrees) were selected and divided into two experimental groups, each containing 15 teeth and one positive control group containing 10 teeth. The canals of all the teeth were prepared with rotary RaCe instruments up to #35. In the NaOCl solution group, the root canals were flushed with 2.5% NaOCl solution during instrumentation and in NaOCl gel group, the instruments were coated with gel form of NaOCl and used inside the root canals; then saline was used for root canal irrigation. Finally, 1 mL of 17% EDTA was used to rinse inside the root canals and remained in the root canals for 2 minutes in the both experimental groups; in the saline group, only saline was used for irrigation. The amount of the smear layer was quantified according to the Torabinejad method using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. All the statistical analyses were set with a significance level of alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between NaOCl gel and solution forms in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals. There were significant differences between NaOCl solution and saline groups in the three parts of root canal walls and between NaOCl gel and saline in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. CONCLUSION: The use of NaOCl gel can be as effective as NaOCl solution along with EDTA in smear layer removal in the three parts of root canal walls.
机译:简介:尚未研究过次氯酸钠(NaOCl)凝胶和EDTA对去除涂片层的影响。因此,本研究的目的是比较凝胶和NaOCl溶液形式从根管壁去除涂抹层的功效。方法:选择40根最小曲率(<5度)的单根牙齿,分为两个实验组,每组包含15颗牙齿,一个阳性对照组则包含10颗牙齿。所有牙齿的根管均使用旋转RaCe器械(最高#35)进行准备。在NaOCl溶液组中,在器械安装过程中用2.5%NaOCl溶液冲洗根管;在NaOCl凝胶组中,将器械涂以NaOCl凝胶形式并在根管内使用;然后用生理盐水冲洗根管。最后,在两个实验组中,使用1 mL 17%EDTA冲洗牙根管,并在牙根管中保留2分钟。在盐水组中,仅盐水用于灌溉。使用扫描电子显微镜,根据Torabinejad法定量涂抹层的量。数据通过Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney检验进行分析。所有统计分析的显着性水平设置为alpha = 0.05。结果:在根管的冠状,中部和顶端,NaOCl凝胶与溶液形式之间无显着差异。在根管壁的三个部分中,NaOCl溶液和盐水组之间存在显着差异,在冠状,中部和根尖的三分之二之间,NaOCl凝胶和盐水之间存在显着差异。结论:使用NaOCl凝胶与EDTA以及NaOCl溶液在根管壁三部分的涂抹层去除方面一样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号