...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endocrinological Investigation: Official Journal of the Italian Society of Endocrinology >Utility of combined use of plasma levels of chromogranin A and pancreatic polypeptide in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors.
【24h】

Utility of combined use of plasma levels of chromogranin A and pancreatic polypeptide in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors.

机译:血浆嗜铬粒蛋白A和胰多肽结合使用在诊断胃肠道和胰腺内分泌肿瘤中的实用性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Chromogranin A (CgA) is considered the most accurate marker in the diagnosis of gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) endocrine tumors. Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) has also been proposed to play this role, but then not used due to its low sensitivity. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the assessment of PP would improve the diagnostic reliability of CgA in patients with GEP tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Both markers were assessed in 68 patients [28 functioning (F), 40 non functioning (NF)]. Twenty-seven patients disease-free (DF) after surgery, and 24 with non-endocrine tumors (non-ETs) were used as control groups. RESULTS: CgA sensitivity was: 96% in F, 75% in NF, 74% in pancreatic, and 91% in gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Specificity was 89% vs DF, and 63% vs non-ETs. PP sensitivity was: 54% in F, 57% in NF, 63% in pancreatic, and 53% in GI tumors. Specificity was 81% vs DF, and 67% vs non-ETs. By combining the two markers a significant gain in sensitivity vs CgA alone was obtained: overall in GEP tumors (96% vs 84%, p = 0.04), in NF (95% vs 75%, p = 0.02), and in pancreatic (94% vs 74%, p = 0.04). More specifically, a 25% gain of sensitivity was obtained in the subgroup of NF pancreatic tumors (93% vs 68%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The combined assessment of PP and CgA leads to a significant increase in sensitivity in the diagnosis of GEP tumors, particularly in pancreatic NF.
机译:背景:嗜铬粒蛋白A(CgA)被认为是诊断胃-胰腺(GEP)内分泌肿瘤的最准确标记。胰多肽(PP)也被提议发挥这一作用,但由于其低敏感性而未被使用。本研究的目的是确定PP的评估是否会提高CEP对GEP肿瘤患者的诊断可靠性。患者和方法:在68例患者中评估了这两种标记物[28个功能正常(F),40个功能异常(NF)]。手术后的27例无病患者(DF)和24例无内分泌肿瘤(non-ET)的患者被用作对照组。结果:CgA敏感性为:F中96%,NF中75%,胰腺中74%,胃肠道(GI)肿瘤中91%。与DF相比,特异性为89%,与非ETs相比,特异性为63%。 PP敏感性为:F占54%,NF占57%,胰腺占63%,GI肿瘤占53%。与DF相比,特异性为81%,与非ETs相比,特异性为67%。通过组合这两种标记,与单独使用CgA相比,灵敏度显着提高:总体上,GEP肿瘤(96%vs 84%,p = 0.04),NF(95%vs 75%,p = 0.02)和胰腺癌( 94%和74%,p = 0.04)。更具体地说,在NF胰腺肿瘤亚组中敏感性提高了25%(93%对68%,p = 0.04)。结论:PP和CgA的联合评估可显着提高诊断GEP肿瘤(尤其是胰腺NF)的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号