首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Impact of Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Occlusion
【24h】

Impact of Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Occlusion

机译:药物洗脱支架植入对F股支架内闭塞的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare optimal balloon angioplasty with nitinol stenting and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for femoropopliteal in-stent occlusion (ISO). Methods: A dual center, retrospective study was performed from January 2004 to December 2014 encompassing 110 ISOs after bare nitinol stenting for a femoropopliteal lesion in 100 patients (mean age 72.7 +/- 10.1 years; 58 men). These patients underwent optimal balloon angioplasty with implantation of a bare stent (conventional group, n=79) or a DES (n=21). The primary endpoint was recurrent in-stent restenosis (Re-ISR); secondary endpoints were recurrent target lesion revascularization (Re-TLR), reocclusion, and major adverse limb events (MALE). Re-ISR or reocclusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after TLR. Restenosis was defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 on a duplex scan or >50% stenosis on angiography. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify any relationships between patient and procedure variables and the occurrence of Re-ISR; the results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The mean follow-up period was 34.9 +/- 27.4 months. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from Re-ISR rates were 79.3% in the DES group and 20.2% in the conventional group, respectively (p<0.001). The rates of freedom from Re-TLR, reocclusion, and MALE at 2 years were 85.7%, 85.9%, and 85.7% in the DES group and 27.1%, 42.5%, and 25.3% in the conventional group, respectively (p<0.001, p=0.006, and p<0.001, respectively). Univariate analysis showed only postprocedure stenosis (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.07, p<0.001) as a predictor of Re-ISR. Postprocedure ABI (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.30, p<0.001) and DES use (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.44, p<0.001) were associated with a lower likelihood of developing Re-ISR. Conclusion: In this small comparative study, DES stent implantation gives more favorable outcomes than conventional treatment for ISO after femoropopliteal stenting.
机译:目的:比较最佳的球囊血管成形术与镍钛合金支架和药物洗脱支架(DES)植入对股pop支架内闭塞(ISO)的作用。方法:从2004年1月至2014年12月,对100名患者(平均年龄72.7 +/- 10.1岁; 58名男性)行裸镍钛合金支架置入股pop部病变后,进行了110个ISO的双中心回顾性研究。这些患者通过裸支架(常规组,n = 79)或DES(n = 21)的植入,进行了最佳的球囊血管成形术。主要终点为复发性支架内再狭窄(Re-ISR);次要终点是复发性靶病变血运重建(Re-TLR),再闭塞和主要不良肢体事件(MALE)。再ISR或再闭塞被定义为TLR后的ISR或闭塞。再狭窄的定义是:双扫描的收缩压峰值速度比> 2.4,或血管造影的狭窄率> 50%。使用单变量Cox回归分析来确定患者和手术变量与Re-ISR发生之间的任何关系。结果表示为危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:平均随访时间为34.9 +/- 27.4个月。在2年时,Kaplan-Meier估计DES组的Re-ISR率分别为79.3%和常规组的20.2%(p <0.001)。 DES组的2年免于Re-TLR,再阻塞和MALE的自由度分别为DES组的85.7%,85.9%和85.7%,常规组分别为27.1%,42.5%和25.3%(p <0.001) ,分别为p = 0.006和p <0.001)。单因素分析仅显示术后狭窄(HR 1.04,95%CI 1.02至1.07,p <0.001)作为Re-ISR的预测指标。术后ABI(HR 0.06,95%CI 0.01至0.30,p <0.001)和DES使用(HR 0.20,95%CI 0.07至0.44,p <0.001)与发生Re-ISR的可能性较低相关。结论:在这项小型的比较研究中,股pop骨支架置入术后DES支架置入比常规ISO治疗具有更好的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号