首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >A comparison of balloon-mounted and self-expanding stents in the carotid arteries: immediate and long-term results of more than 500 patients.
【24h】

A comparison of balloon-mounted and self-expanding stents in the carotid arteries: immediate and long-term results of more than 500 patients.

机译:颈动脉中球囊安装式支架和自扩张式支架的比较:500例患者的近期和长期结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the rates of neurological complications and restenosis for balloon-mounted (BM) versus self-expanding (SE) stents deployed in the extracranial carotid arteries. METHODS: Among 513 patients (312 men; mean age 71.3 years, range 27-91) who underwent carotid artery stent placement, 496 received 520 stents. The patients were followed with periodic duplex ultrasound examinations; angiography was performed whenever the duplex scan identified a >50% stenosis or symptoms warranted investigation. Periprocedural data on complications were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis, while intermediate-term neurological complications were compared in stented patients. RESULTS: In the periprocedural period, there were 19 (3.7%) transient ischemic attacks, 10 (1.9%) minor strokes, 6 (1.2%) major strokes, and 8 (1.6%) deaths among the 513 patients. Five (1.0%) of the deaths were related to neurological complications (3.9% all strokeeurological death rate). Among the 496 patients receiving 247 (48%) BM stents and 273 (52%) SE stents in 518 arteries, the all strokeeurological death rates were 3.6% and 4.0%, respectively (p>0.05). During a mean follow-up of 20.6 months (range to 5.6 years), the 3-year freedom from all fatal and ipsilateral nonfatal strokes excluding the 30-day periprocedural period was 95.0% for BM stents and 95.2% for SE devices. Vessel patency (>50%) at 3 years was 92.0% in the population: 96.3% for BM stents and 83.7% for SE stents (p=0.0422). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of neurological complications following carotid stenting has been relatively low overall, and no differences were found relative to the type of stent deployed. Vessel patency was excellent at 3 years, with slightly better patency in BM stents, but because of their vulnerability to compression, they will not replace SE stents.
机译:目的:比较部署在颅外颈动脉中的球囊安装(BM)支架与自扩张(SE)支架的神经系统并发症和再狭窄率。方法:在513例接受颈动脉支架置入术的患者(312例男性,平均年龄71.3岁,范围27-91)中,有496例接受了520例支架的治疗。对患者进行定期双工超声检查;只要双工扫描发现狭窄> 50%或需要进行调查的症状,便进行血管造影。在意向性治疗的基础上分析了并发症的围手术期数据,同时对支架置入患者的中期神经系统并发症进行了比较。结果:在围手术期,513例患者中有19例(3.7%)短暂性脑缺血发作,10例(1.9%)轻度卒中,6例(1.2%)大卒中和8例(1.6%)死亡。五(1.0%)例死亡与神经系统并发症有关(3.9%的中风/神经系统死亡率)。在496个接受518个动脉的247个(48%)BM支架和273个(52%)SE支架的患者中,所有卒中/神经系统死亡率分别为3.6%和4.0%(p> 0.05)。在平均20.6个月(范围为5.6年)的随访中,BM支架和SE装置的3年无任何致命和同侧非致命性卒中(不包括30天围手术期)为95.0%。人群中3年血管通畅率(> 50%)为92.0%:BM支架为96.3%,SE支架为83.7%(p = 0.0422)。结论:总体而言,颈动脉支架置入术后神经系统并发症的发生率相对较低,相对于所部署支架的类型而言,没有发现差异。血管通透性在3年时表现出色,在BM支架中通畅性稍好,但是由于其易受压,因此无法替代SE支架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号