...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy With the Controlled Antegrade Retrograde Subintimal Tracking (CART) or Reverse CART Technique for Long Infrainguinal Occlusions
【24h】

Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy With the Controlled Antegrade Retrograde Subintimal Tracking (CART) or Reverse CART Technique for Long Infrainguinal Occlusions

机译:控制性整合逆行内膜下追踪(CART)或反向CART技术治疗长时红外线闭塞的血管内治疗结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes associated with the controlled antegrade retrograde subintimal tracking (CART) or reverse CART (r-CART) technique to the conventional retrograde approach in the treatment of patients with long infrainguinal occlusions. Methods: From May 2008 to April 2014, 121 patients failed antegrade recanalization and underwent a retrograde approach to recanalize long infrainguinal occlusions. Patients who underwent successful endovascular therapy (EVT) by the conventional retrograde approach (CRA group) were compared to patients who had successful EVT using the CART/r-CART technique (CART group) after failure of a bidirectional approach. The efficacy, safety, vessel patency, and other clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Fifty-eight patients (mean age 71.6 +/- 12.2 years; 32 men) underwent successful EVT (47.9%, 58/121) using the conventional retrograde approach (CRA group), while 44 patients (mean age 70.8 +/- 11.1 years; 31 men) among the 50 patients who underwent the CART/r-CART technique were successfully treated (88.0%, 44/50). Both groups had similar average occlusion lengths and gained 100% immediate hemodynamic success after EVT. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding procedure-related complications. During follow-up, 28 patients died (p=0.380), but there were no differences in the rates of major (p=0.279) or minor amputation (p=0.417) between the groups. There was no difference in the 2-year primary patency (31% vs 24%, p=0.686), assisted primary patency (66% vs 76%, p=0.251), target vessel revascularization (65% vs 54%, p=0.845), or sustained clinical success (52% vs 46%, p=0.995) rates between the CRA and CART groups, respectively. Conclusion: Based on acceptable safety, efficacy, and follow-up results in this study, the CART/r-CART technique can salvage patients with long peripheral occlusions after failure of the conventional antegrade or retrograde approach.
机译:目的:比较与控制性顺行逆行内膜下追踪(CART)或逆行CART(r-CART)技术与常规逆行方法治疗长红外线下闭塞的安全性,疗效和临床结果。方法:自2008年5月至2014年4月,有121例患者在顺行性再通失败后进行了逆行入路,以再次根除较长的下尿道闭塞。将通过常规逆行方法成功进行血管内治疗(EVT)的患者(CRA组)与在双向方法失败后使用CART / r-CART技术成功进行EVT的患者(CART组)进行比较。比较两组之间的疗效,安全性,血管通畅性和其他临床结局。结果:58名患者(平均年龄71.6 +/- 12.2岁; 32名男性)采用常规逆行方法(CRA组)成功进行了EVT(47.9%,58/121),而44例患者(平均年龄70.8 +/-)在接受CART / r-CART技术的50例患者中,有11.1岁; 31名男性)被成功治疗(88.0%,44/50)。两组的平均闭塞长度相似,EVT后立即获得100%的立即血流动力学成功率。两组之间与手术相关的并发症没有显着差异。在随访期间,有28例患者死亡(p = 0.380),但两组之间的大截肢率(p = 0.279)或小截肢率(p = 0.417)没有差异。 2年初次通畅率(31%vs 24%,p = 0.686),辅助初次通畅率(66%vs 76%,p = 0.251),目标血管血运重建(65%vs 54%,p = CRA和CART组之间的比率分别为0.845)或持续的临床成功率(52%vs 46%,p = 0.995)。结论:基于可接受的安全性,有效性和后续研究结果,CART / r-CART技术可以挽救常规顺行或逆行方法失败后具有长周边闭塞的患者。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号