首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Drug-Eluting Stent vs Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Retrospective 1-Year Multicenter Study
【24h】

Drug-Eluting Stent vs Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Retrospective 1-Year Multicenter Study

机译:药物洗脱支架与经皮腔内血管成形术治疗股pop支架内再狭窄:一项为期一年的回顾性多中心研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods: A comparison was performed of data from 112 ZEPHYR registry patients (mean age 74 +/- 9 years; 60 men) with 119 femoropopliteal ISR lesions treated with a drug-eluting stent (Zilver PTX) with historical data from 116 patients (mean age 72 +/- 8 years; 83 men) with 133 lesions treated with PTA. The patients were stratified for analysis by lesions with (101/252, 40%) and without (n=151) in-stent occlusion. The primary outcome measure was the 1-year incidence of recurrent restenosis; the secondary outcome was major adverse limb events (MALE). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to look for any independent association of DES implantation with 1-year recurrent restenosis in the respective subgroups; results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: In the subgroup without in-stent occlusion, there was no significant difference between DES and PTA in the 1-year incidence of recurrent restenosis (40.5% vs 45.7%, p=0.583, respectively) or MALE (27.8% vs 20.7%, p=0.322, respectively). However, in the subgroup with in-stent occlusion, DES implantation was associated with significantly lower incidences of recurrent restenosis (44.1% vs 90.3% for PTA, p<0.001) and MALE (25.5% vs 53.6% for PTA, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that DES implantation had a significant independent negative association with the risk of recurrent restenosis in the subgroup with occlusion (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.6, p=0.006). Conclusion: DES implantation may be more effective than PTA in the management of femoropopliteal ISR with occlusion, but equally effective to PTA in nonocclusive ISR lesions. These results require confirmation in prospective randomized studies.
机译:目的:比较药物洗脱支架(DES)和经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)在股fe支架内再狭窄(ISR)治疗中的作用。方法:比较112例ZEPHYR登记患者(平均年龄74 +/- 9岁; 60名男性)经药物洗脱支架(Zilver PTX)治疗的119例股popISR病变与116例患者(平均)的历史数据的比较年龄72 +/- 8岁; 83名男性),经PTA治疗后有133个病变。根据有(101/252,40%)和无(n = 151)支架内阻塞的病变对患者进行分层分析。主要结局指标是复发性再狭窄的1年发生率。次要结果是主要的不良肢体事件(MALE)。进行多因素logistic回归分析,以寻找各个亚组中DES植入与1年复发性再狭窄的任何独立关联。结果表示为优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:在没有支架内阻塞的亚组中,DES和PTA在复发性再狭窄的1年发生率(分别为40.5%对45.7%,p = 0.583)或MALE(27.8%对20.7%)上没有显着差异。 ,分别为p = 0.322)。但是,在支架内阻塞的亚组中,DES植入与复发性再狭窄的发生率显着降低(PTA分别为44.1%和90.3%,p <0.001)和MALE(PTA分别为25.5%和53.6%,p <0.001)。 。多变量分析证实,DES植入与闭塞亚组复发性再狭窄的风险具有显着的独立负相关性(OR 0.2,95%CI 0.1至0.6,p = 0.006)。结论:DES植入在闭塞股popISR方面可能比PTA更有效,但在非闭塞ISR病变中对PTA同样有效。这些结果需要在前瞻性随机研究中得到证实。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号