首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Carotid artery stenting in patients with left ICA stenosis and bovine aortic arch: A single-center experience in 60 consecutive patients treated via the right radial or brachial approach
【24h】

Carotid artery stenting in patients with left ICA stenosis and bovine aortic arch: A single-center experience in 60 consecutive patients treated via the right radial or brachial approach

机译:左ICA狭窄和牛主动脉弓的患者的颈动脉支架置入术:60例通过右patients骨或肱动脉入路治疗的连续患者的单中心经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) of the left internal carotid artery (LICA) from a right radial/brachial approach in patients with bovine aortic arch. Methods: Among 505 consecutive CAS patients treated at our facility between June 2007 and December 2012, 60 (11.9%) patients (44 men; mean age 73±9 years) with LICA stenosis and bovine arch were treated from a right radial (n=32) or brachial (n=28) approach. Three quarters of the patients had characteristics qualifying them at high surgical risk; 52 were asymptomatic. The types of cerebral protection (a distal filter or proximal MO.MA system), stent, and technique were at the operation's discretion. Results: The radial/brachial approach was successful in 59 (98.3%) of 60 procedures; 1 case was converted to a femoral approach. Proximal protection was used in 15 cases (11 brachial, 4 radial) with severe, soft plaques, although the MO.MA system proved too short in a tall patient having a radial approach and a filter was used. Clinical success with no adverse events was 96.7% owing to 1 retinal embolism and 1 minor stroke. Vascular complications occurred in 2 (3.3%) brachial group patients. No major bleeding was encountered. Over a mean follow-up of 18.7±17.5 months, midterm event-free survival was 93%. No target vessel revascularization was necessary. Conclusion: CAS via a right radial or brachial approach is safe and effective in patients with LICA stenosis and types 1 or 2 bovine arch.
机译:目的:通过右radial臂/肱入路评估牛主动脉弓患者左颈内动脉(LICA)颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的安全性和有效性。方法:从2007年6月至2012年12月在我院接受治疗的505例连续CAS患者中,有60例(11.9%)患有LICA狭窄和牛弓的患者(44名男性;平均年龄73±9岁)从右right骨入路(n = 32)或肱(n = 28)方法。四分之三的患者具有使他们具有高手术风险的特征。 52例无症状。脑部保护的类型(远端过滤器或近端MO.MA系统),支架和技术由手术决定。结果:60例手术中有59例(98.3%)The骨/肱动脉入路成功。 1例被转换为股骨入路。尽管MO.MA系统在身高较高且采用radial骨入路的患者中过短,并使用了滤网,但在15例(重度11臂,radial骨4例)严重,软斑块中采用了近端保护。 1例视网膜栓塞和1例轻度中风,无不良事件的临床成功率为96.7%。血管并发症发生在2名(3.3%)肱组患者中。没有遇到大出血。在平均18.7±17.5个月的随访中,中期无事件生存率为93%。不需要靶血管血运重建。结论:通过右radial臂或肱动脉入路的CAS对LICA狭窄和1型或2型牛弓狭窄的患者安全有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号