...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Drug-eluting and bare nitinol stents for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery: long-term results from the SIROCCO trial.
【24h】

Drug-eluting and bare nitinol stents for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery: long-term results from the SIROCCO trial.

机译:药物洗脱和裸镍钛合金支架用于治疗股浅动脉粥样硬化病变:SIROCCO试验的长期结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To review clinical outcomes of patients with chronic limb ischemia and TASC type C lesions treated with sirolimus-eluting versus bare SMART nitinol self-expanding stents. METHODS: Data were obtained from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded study conducted in 2 phases. All 93 patients had chronic limb ischemia and superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusions or stenoses (average lesion length 8.3 cm). In total, 47 patients (31 men; mean age 66.3+/-9.1 years, range 50-84) received the sirolimus-eluting SMART stent and 46 patients (36 men; mean age 65.9 +/-10.8 years, range 38-83) received a bare SMART nitinol stent. Both groups were followed for a mean 24 months. RESULTS: Both the sirolimus-eluting and the bare SMART stents were effective in revascularizing the diseased SFA and in sustaining freedom from restenosis. For both types of stents, improvements in ankle-brachial indices (ABI) and symptoms of claudication were maintained over 24 months (median 24-month ABI 0.96 for the sirolimus group versus 0.87 for the bare stent group, p>0.05). At 24 months, the restenosis rate in the sirolimus group was 22.9% versus 21.1% in the bare stent group (p>0.05). The cumulative in-stent restenosis rates according to duplex ultrasound were 4.7%, 9.0%, 15.6%, and 21.9%, respectively, at 6, 9, 18, and 24 months; the rates did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. The TLR rate for the sirolimus group was 6% and for the bare stent group 13%; the TVR rates were somewhat higher: 13% and 22%, respectively. Mortality rates did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that the sirolimus-eluting and the bare SMART stent are effective, safe, and free from restenosis in a majority of patients for up to 24 months. Because the restenosis rate in the bare stent group is unexpectedly low, no significant difference could be found between the sirolimus-eluting and the bare SMART stents.
机译:目的:回顾用西罗莫司洗脱与裸SMART镍钛诺自膨式支架治疗的慢性肢体缺血和TASC C型病变患者的临床结局。方法:数据来自分两个阶段进行的随机,多中心,双盲研究。所有93例患者均患有慢性肢体缺血和股浅动脉(SFA)阻塞或狭窄(平均病变长度8.3 cm)。总共有47例患者(31名男性;平均年龄66.3 +/- 9.1岁,范围50-84)接受西罗莫司洗脱SMART支架; 46例患者(36名男性;平均年龄65.9 +/- 10.8岁,范围38-83) )接受裸露的SMART镍钛合金支架。两组平均随访24个月。结果:西罗莫司洗脱支架和裸露的SMART支架均能有效地使患病的SFA血运重建并保持免受再狭窄的自由。对于这两种类型的支架,踝臂指数(ABI)和of行症状的改善在24个月内得以维持(西罗莫司组的24个月中位ABI为0.96,裸支架组为0.87,p> 0.05)。在24个月时,西罗莫司组的再狭窄率为22.9%,而裸支架组为21.1%(p> 0.05)。在6、9、18和24个月时,根据双工超声,支架内再狭窄的累积率分别为4.7%,9.0%,15.6%和21.9%;治疗组之间的比率没有显着差异。西罗莫司组的TLR率为6%,裸支架组为13%。 TVR比率较高:分别为13%和22%。两组之间的死亡率没有显着差异。结论:这些数据表明西罗莫司洗脱和SMART裸支架在大多数患者中长达24个月有效,安全且无再狭窄。由于裸支架组的再狭窄率出乎意料的低,因此西罗莫司洗脱支架和SMART裸支架之间​​没有发现显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号