【24h】

Endovascular approaches for complex forms of recurrent aortic coarctation.

机译:复杂形式的主动脉缩窄的血管内入路。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To review a single-center experience with endovascular treatment of recurrent aortic coarctation in adults. METHODS: Since 1998, 11 patients (9 men; mean age 48+/-15 years, range 16-63) with recurrent aortic coarctation following previous coarctation repair were referred to our institution for treatment. Clinical presentations included pseudoaneurysm (n=2), restenosis (n=3), pseudoaneurysm accompanied by restenosis (n=4), and rupture of a post-coarctation pseudoaneurysm (n=2). All patients were treated using an endovascular approach as part of a single-center investigational device exemption protocol. RESULTS: Endovascular interventions included Palmaz stent implantation (n=3), implantation of an endoluminal graft (n=2), or a combination of both treatments in 6 patients. Three patients underwent balloon angioplasty before stenting or endografting, and 2 patients had a carotid-subclavian bypass done before the endovascular repair. All repairs were technically and clinically successful. The median length of stay after repair was 2.0+/-2.3 days. In follow-up, 2 patients underwent a carotid-subclavian bypass for left upper extremity claudication. Two patients required reintervention owing to migration of the stent in 1 and an endoleak 2 years after the initial procedure in the other. CONCLUSION: Endovascular approaches to adult coarctation appear to be safe and effective. With the emergence of endoluminal grafts and the widespread availability of the Palmaz stent, endovascular repair offers an excellent alternative to open surgery for complex cases of recurrent coarctation. Additional studies are indicated to assess the long-term outcomes of these patients.
机译:目的:回顾单中心治疗成人复发性主动脉缩窄的单中心经验。方法:自1998年以来,有11例患者(9例男性,平均年龄48 +/- 15岁,范围16-63)在先前的缩窄修复后复发性主动脉缩窄,被转诊至我院接受治疗。临床表现包括假性动脉瘤(n = 2),再狭窄(n = 3),伴有再狭窄的假性动脉瘤(n = 4)和缩窄后的假性动脉瘤(n = 2)破裂。所有患者均接受血管内治疗,这是单中心研究设备免除方案的一部分。结果:6例患者的血管内干预包括Palmaz支架植入术(n = 3),腔内移植物植入(n = 2)或两种疗法的结合。 3例患者在置入支架或进行内移植之前进行了球囊血管成形术,2例在进行血管内修复之前进行了颈-锁骨下旁路手术。所有维修在技术上和临床上都是成功的。修复后的中位住院时间为2.0 +/- 2.3天。在随访中,有2例患者因左上肢c行行颈动脉-锁骨下旁路手术。由于支架在1年内迁移,而另一例在初始手术后2年内渗漏,因此两名患者需要再次介入治疗。结论:成人缩窄的腔内方法似乎是安全有效的。随着腔内移植物的出现以及Palmaz支架的广泛普及,对于复杂的复发性缩窄病例,血管内修复术是开放手术的绝佳替代方案。需进行其他研究以评估这些患者的长期预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号